would be rejected

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be rejected" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is likely to be dismissed or not accepted in a hypothetical situation. Example: "If the proposal does not meet the required standards, it would be rejected by the committee."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Any idea of it would be rejected".

The New York Times

"It would be rejected," he said.

The New York Times

She suspected it would be rejected.

The New York Times - Magazine

"He thought he would be rejected".

The New York Times

Communism's psychological and political appeal would be rejected.

The Washington Post

With traditional call-blocking systems, those calls would be rejected.

The New York Times

The proposal would be rejected outright by British Eurosceptics.

The Guardian - Business

So this wouldn't match, and that would be rejected sometimes, so matches may fail.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Because of the limited buffer capacity, jobs finding the system full upon their arrival would be rejected.

European Journal of Operational Research

The times when a barrage scheme would be rejected due to environmental and cost concerns is coming to an end.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Today, they would be rejected out of hand.[2] Face — Oval?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "would be rejected", ensure that the context clearly establishes the conditions under which the rejection would occur. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "would be rejected" excessively in your writing, as it relies on the passive voice. Active voice often makes your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The proposal would be rejected by the committee", consider "The committee would reject the proposal".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be rejected" functions as a passive construction within a conditional statement, indicating a potential future outcome of non-acceptance. Ludwig AI's examples demonstrate its use across various contexts, expressing a likely refusal based on specific conditions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be rejected" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that indicates the likelihood of something being refused or not accepted. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage across various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science, and Academia. While the phrase is generally suitable, it's important to be mindful of overuse and consider employing the active voice for more direct writing. Related phrases such as "would be turned down" or "would be declined" can offer nuanced alternatives depending on the specific context. When using "would be rejected", clarity in establishing the rejection conditions is crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be turned down

Implies a refusal or denial of something offered or proposed, focusing on the act of declining.

would not be accepted

A straightforward expression indicating a lack of agreement or approval.

would be declined

A more formal way of saying "would be turned down", suggesting a polite refusal.

would be refused

Indicates a firm and often explicit rejection, highlighting the lack of consent.

would be disapproved

Suggests that something would not meet the required standards or gain necessary approval.

would face rejection

Emphasizes the likelihood of encountering disapproval or denial.

would be dismissed

Implies that something is considered unimportant or not worthy of attention, leading to its rejection.

would be vetoed

Suggests a rejection by someone with the authority to prevent something from happening.

would be nullified

Indicates that something's legal force or validity would be cancelled.

would not pass muster

Suggests that something would not meet the required standards or scrutiny.

FAQs

How can I use "would be rejected" in a sentence?

You can use "would be rejected" to express that something is likely to be refused or not accepted under certain conditions. For example: "If the application is incomplete, it "would be rejected" immediately."

What are some alternatives to "would be rejected"?

Some alternatives include "would be turned down", "would be declined", or "would be refused". The best choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality required.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "would be rejected"?

While "would be rejected" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct. For instance, instead of "The idea would be rejected by the team", you could say "The team would reject the idea".

What does "would be rejected" imply?

"Would be rejected" implies a conditional future outcome where something is likely to be disapproved, refused, or not accepted based on certain criteria or circumstances. It suggests a potential for non-acceptance rather than a definite outcome.