would be quicker

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be quicker" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the speed of two actions or suggesting a more efficient option. Example: "Taking the train instead of driving would be quicker for our trip to the city."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It would be quicker.

The Guardian - Opinion

I thought the pace would be quicker.

The New York Times - Sports

For this one, cooking fresh would be quicker and easier.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

A blood test would be quicker and cheaper.

MIT Technology Review

"But I was told that if I helped them in some way it would be quicker".

The New York Times

"At 19.2, it would be quicker to drive somewhere and find a real computer".

The New York Times - Tech

"If there were also structural reforms, the effect of these policies would be quicker," he said.

The New York Times

Health Secretary Alan Milburn had sought a private session, saying it would be quicker.

The New York Times

"It would be quicker to hop on the Jubilee line," he says.

The Guardian - Film

'It would be quicker to walk,' muttered Andrew Craig from Aberdeen.

The Guardian

They would be quicker to see the justice in others' claims and to grant what others deserve.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing two methods or actions, use "would be quicker" to clearly indicate which one takes less time.

Common error

Avoid using "would be quicker" when not comparing two options. For instance, instead of saying "The process would be quicker", specify what it's quicker than or rephrase to "The process would be faster."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be quicker" functions primarily as a comparative adjective phrase. It is used to express that one action or method is faster than another. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is grammatically sound and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be quicker" is a grammatically correct and frequently used comparative adjective phrase. It serves to compare the speed of two actions or methods, suggesting that one is faster than the other. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in English, and the extensive examples demonstrate its versatility across various contexts, particularly in news and media. While "would be quicker" is widely applicable, it's important to use it in comparative contexts and choose alternatives like "would be faster" or "would save time" if a more precise nuance is needed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be faster

Replaces "quicker" with its direct synonym, "faster", maintaining identical meaning and structure.

would be speedier

Substitutes "quicker" with "speedier", offering a slightly more formal tone while conveying the same concept of faster completion.

would be more rapid

Replaces "quicker" with "more rapid", emphasizing the swiftness of the action in a slightly more formal manner.

would save time

Shifts focus from comparative speed to the outcome of saving time, altering the phrasing while retaining the core idea of efficiency.

would accelerate the process

Replaces the entire phrase with a more descriptive expression, highlighting the act of speeding up a process rather than simply being faster.

would expedite matters

Uses a more formal and business-oriented vocabulary to express the idea of making something happen faster.

would hasten the completion

Emphasizes speeding up the act of finishing something, suitable for formal contexts.

would streamline the workflow

Focuses on making a workflow more efficient, implying speed as a result of optimized processes.

would be a time-saver

Highlights the benefit of saving time, shifting the emphasis from comparative speed to the utility of the action.

would be more efficient

Broadens the scope to general efficiency, which includes speed but also encompasses other aspects like resource utilization.

FAQs

How can I use "would be quicker" in a sentence?

Use "would be quicker" to compare two actions or methods, indicating that one is faster than the other. Example: "Taking the train "would be quicker" than driving during rush hour."

What are some alternatives to "would be quicker"?

You can use alternatives such as "would be faster", "would save time", or "would expedite matters", depending on the specific context and desired formality.

Is it correct to say "will be quicker" instead of "would be quicker"?

While both are grammatically correct, "would be quicker" implies a hypothetical or conditional situation, whereas "will be quicker" suggests a future certainty. Choose the phrasing that best reflects the context and intent.

What's the difference between "would be quicker" and "would be easier"?

"Would be quicker" focuses solely on the time aspect, indicating that one option takes less time. "Would be easier", on the other hand, implies less effort or difficulty, which might not always correlate with speed.