would be considered

USAGE SUMMARY

"would be considered" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express a hypothetical situation, or to show that something is likely to be true. For example: "His success in the competition, if achieved, would be considered an impressive accomplishment."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

1% would be 3m.

BBC

Moran said there would be 24..

Los Angeles Times

"My guess would be £34".

Vice

So it would be yfebe5n19o74m.

WikiHow

She would be 107.

The New York Times - Magazine

"Clinton Hill would be 1.5.

The New Yorker

My daughter would be 50.

The New York Times

And Park Slope would be 1.8".

The New Yorker

You would be 2 1/2 mls.

The New Yorker

It would be £3 in Cumbria".

The Guardian - Money

Another interesting number would be 300 victories.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "would be considered" to express a hypothetical scenario or a conditional outcome. Ensure the context clearly indicates the conditions under which something would be considered in a certain way.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive constructions with "would be considered", as it can make writing sound indirect and vague. Consider active voice alternatives where appropriate to create clearer and more impactful sentences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be considered" functions as a modal passive construction. It expresses a hypothetical or conditional judgment or evaluation. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's grammatically correct and usable in written English, setting up a situation where something could be viewed in a particular light given certain conditions.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be considered" serves to introduce a hypothetical or conditional assessment. Though Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability, its effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the surrounding context. By providing options like "might be deemed" or "could be regarded as", writers can fine-tune the level of formality and emphasis in their writing, leading to more precise and impactful communication. Remember to avoid overuse of passive constructions to maintain clarity and engagement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

could be regarded as

Replaces "considered" with "regarded", emphasizing a viewpoint or opinion.

might be deemed

Uses "deemed" instead of "considered", suggesting a formal judgment or assessment.

could be seen as

Emphasizes perception or interpretation rather than a formal evaluation.

might be thought of as

Suggests a more casual or informal way of viewing something.

could be classified as

Focuses on categorization or classification of something.

may be judged to be

Implies a formal evaluation or judgment.

might be understood as

Highlights the interpretation or comprehension of something.

could be interpreted as

Focuses on the potential for different interpretations.

may be looked upon as

Suggests a specific perspective or viewpoint.

might be viewed as

Similar to "could be seen as", but slightly more formal.

FAQs

How can I use "would be considered" in a sentence?

The phrase "would be considered" is used to express a hypothetical or conditional situation. For instance, "If the project succeeds, it "would be considered" a major achievement".

What is a more formal alternative to "would be considered"?

A more formal alternative "might be deemed", which implies a more official or authoritative judgment.

What's the difference between "would be considered" and "should be considered"?

"Would be considered" suggests a hypothetical evaluation based on certain conditions, while "should be considered" implies a recommendation or obligation for something to be taken into account. The former is conditional; the latter is advisory.

Can "would be considered" be used in active voice?

No, "would be considered" is inherently a passive construction. To use the active voice, rephrase the sentence to indicate who is doing the considering. For example, instead of "The action "would be considered" unethical", try "The ethics board would consider the action unethical".