would be challenged

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be challenged" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is likely to face difficulties or opposition in the future. Example: "The proposal would be challenged by several stakeholders who have differing opinions on the matter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The ruling would be challenged, of course.

The New Yorker

Seven months later, that assumption would be challenged.

The New York Times

Senior party sources said Corbyn's right to remove Ashworth from the NEC would be challenged.

The Guardian

It is a scandal, and would be challenged in nearly every country of the world.

The Guardian - Opinion

A spokesman for Heathrow said the airport was open but would be "challenged" today.

The Guardian

I knew that their expectations for me would be challenged - and most likely exchanged for anxieties.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Dr. Slade's lawyer said the dismissal would be challenged in a lawsuit.

The New York Times

So they would be challenged by the 8th Duke of Devonshire's gamekeepers.

The Guardian - Travel

Finally, it became clear that he would be challenged by other Democrats if he ran for a third term.

The New York Times

Any banking system would be challenged by anaemic growth, grinding deflation and interest rates close to zero.

The Economist

If I had read every page carefully, I would have seen that there were expenses that would be challenged.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider replacing "would be challenged" with a more specific verb to convey the nature of the challenge, such as "would be contested", "would be questioned", or "would be opposed" depending on the situation.

Common error

Avoid using "would be challenged" excessively in contexts where active voice would be more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The decision would be challenged by the opposition", consider "The opposition would challenge the decision".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be challenged" functions as a passive voice construction, typically indicating that a subject is likely to face opposition, scrutiny, or questioning. Ludwig confirms its validity and diverse usage. It suggests a potential future action or event where the subject encounters difficulties.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

76%

Science

13%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "would be challenged" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that indicates a prediction or expectation of future difficulties or opposition. Ludwig AI validates its usage across various contexts, primarily in News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias. Its neutral register makes it suitable for diverse writing styles. Writers should be mindful of the passive voice and consider active alternatives for more direct communication. Alternatives like "might face opposition" or "could encounter resistance" can provide nuanced expressions. By understanding its function and potential pitfalls, writers can effectively use "would be challenged" to convey potential obstacles with precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

might face opposition

Emphasizes the potential for resistance or disagreement.

could encounter resistance

Highlights the possibility of confronting obstacles or pushback.

may be called into question

Focuses on the potential for doubts or uncertainties to arise.

might be disputed

Suggests the possibility of disagreement or contention.

could be contested

Indicates the potential for a formal challenge or dispute.

may be put to the test

Highlights the idea of facing a trial or evaluation of validity.

might be subject to scrutiny

Emphasizes the potential for close examination and critical assessment.

could be up for debate

Indicates the possibility of discussion and differing opinions.

may meet with disapproval

Focuses on the potential for encountering negative feedback or rejection.

might provoke controversy

Suggests the possibility of generating public disagreement or debate.

FAQs

How can I use "would be challenged" in a sentence?

You can use "would be challenged" to indicate that something is likely to face difficulties or opposition. For example, "The new law "would be challenged" in court".

What can I say instead of "would be challenged"?

You can use alternatives like "might face opposition", "could encounter resistance", or "may be called into question" depending on the context.

Is "would be challenged" formal or informal?

"Would be challenged" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, in very informal settings, simpler alternatives may be preferred.

What is the difference between "would be challenged" and "will be challenged"?

"Would be challenged" often implies a hypothetical or conditional scenario, while "will be challenged" suggests a more definite future action. For example, "If the policy is implemented, it "would be challenged"" versus "The policy "will be challenged" regardless".