worth of damage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "worth of damage" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is expensive or has a large financial cost associated with it. For example, "The alleyway was full of debris worth of damage to clean up."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The city sustained 1 billion roubles (£10m) worth of damage.

The Guardian

"He did £4,000 worth of damage to the bodywork.

Independent

It cost $250,000 or so worth of damage.

The Economist

"We've done at least $15,000 worth of damage already," Mr. Baratta said.

The New York Times

Seaside Park Councilwoman Nancy Koury said the fire caused several million dollars' worth of damage.

The Guardian

He is accused of causing millions of dollars' worth of damage.

The Guardian

In addition, they caused $50,000 worth of damage to the Panix.com computer system, he said.

The New York Times

When we did the Meadowlands, there was $172,000 worth of damage to the hall.

The Guardian - Music

The attacks had reputedly caused millions of pounds' worth of damage.

The Guardian

That event caused $120,000 worth of damage to the lawn's Kentucky bluegrass.

The New York Times

The fuel is alleged to have caused millions of pounds worth of damage to power stations.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When quantifying damage, specify the currency (e.g., dollars, pounds, euros) for clarity, especially when reporting to an international audience or comparing damages across different regions.

Common error

Avoid simply stating the "worth of damage" without providing context about what was damaged, or the cause of the damage. Always contextualize the damage for the reader.

Linguistic Context

The primary function of the phrase "worth of damage" is to quantify the financial extent of harm or destruction caused to something. It serves as a measure of economic impact, often used in reports, news articles, and assessments following incidents like natural disasters or accidents. Ludwig confirms this through its examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Wiki

8%

Science

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "worth of damage" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to quantify financial losses resulting from various events. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is suitable for use in a variety of contexts, particularly in news reporting, academic discussions, and formal assessments. When using this phrase, clarity and precision are crucial; specify the currency, contextualize the damage, and avoid vagueness to ensure effective communication. Its prevalence in authoritative sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and BBC reinforces its acceptability and widespread usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

amount of damage

Focuses on the quantity of damage rather than its value.

extent of the damage

Emphasizes the scope or range of the damage incurred.

level of damage

Highlights the severity or degree of the damage.

financial cost of damage

Directly specifies the monetary aspect of the damage.

monetary value of damage

Similar to financial cost but may imply a formal assessment.

damage expenses

Emphasizes expenses incurred as a consequence of damage.

cost of repairs

Focuses specifically on the cost associated with fixing the damage.

economic impact of the damage

Broadens the perspective to include the overall economic effects.

loss due to damage

Emphasizes the loss or deficit resulting from the damage.

total damage assessment

Denotes a comprehensive valuation of all damage-related costs.

FAQs

How can I use "worth of damage" in a sentence?

You can use "worth of damage" to describe the financial cost resulting from an event. For example, "The storm caused $5 million "worth of damage" to the coastal properties".

What are some alternatives to saying "worth of damage"?

Alternatives include "amount of damage", "extent of the damage", or "financial cost of damage", depending on the specific context and the aspect you wish to emphasize.

Is it correct to say "value of damage" instead of "worth of damage"?

While "value of damage" is understandable, "worth of damage" is more common and idiomatic when referring to the financial cost or monetary extent of the damage.

What's the difference between "worth of damage" and "damage expenses"?

"Worth of damage" typically refers to the total estimated cost resulting from damage, while "damage expenses" can refer to specific costs incurred in repairing or addressing the damage.