worth at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "worth at" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not a standard expression and may confuse readers. Example: "The painting is worth at least a million dollars."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Forbes puts Mr. Kaiser's net worth at $10 billion.

The New York Times

She calculated their net worth at $1.2 million.

The New York Times

Forbes estimates his net worth at $5.6 billion.

The New York Times

Zillow estimates its current worth at $645,000.

The New York Times

A few month's worth at least.

The Guardian

He estimated its worth at $40 million.

The New York Times

Thirty-five grand's worth at retail.

The Guardian - Business

Forbes estimates Robertson's net worth at $2.4 billion.

The New Yorker

It's probably more trouble than it's worth at the moment".

The New York Times

At 65, Mr Hasan is worth at least $1 billion.

The Economist

In 2010, Forbes estimated his net worth at $1.7 billion.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use precise language like "valued at" or "estimated at" to convey the intended meaning of "worth at" with grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "worth at" as it is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "worth" alone or replace it with more appropriate alternatives like "valued at" or "estimated at" to ensure clarity and correctness in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "worth at" functions primarily to estimate the value or price of something. However, Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically incorrect. While commonly used, it's best to use alternatives for clearer and more accurate communication.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "worth at" is frequently used to express the estimated value of something, but Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. While common in News & Media contexts, its use should be avoided in formal or professional settings. For precise and correct writing, alternatives such as "valued at", "estimated at", or simply "worth" are recommended. Using these alternatives enhances clarity and credibility. Ludwig's analysis emphasizes the importance of choosing grammatically sound phrases to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

valued at

Replaces "worth at" with a more precise and grammatically sound expression, emphasizing the assessed value.

estimated at

Suggests an approximate valuation, similar to "worth at" but with greater grammatical correctness.

equal to

Indicates equivalence in value, providing a clear and grammatically correct alternative.

has a value of

A more verbose but grammatically sound replacement, clearly stating the item's value.

carries a value of

Emphasizes the inherent value, similar to "worth at" but more formal and precise.

assessed at

Suggests a formal assessment of value, offering a more professional tone.

is priced at

Focuses on the price assigned to an item, a specific type of valuation.

is considered to be worth

Attributes the valuation to a general opinion, offering a nuanced perspective.

regarded as having a value of

Similar to 'is considered to be worth', but adds emphasis to the estimated value itself.

calculated to be

Highlights the method used to determine the value.

FAQs

How can I correctly express the idea of something being "worth at" a certain amount?

Instead of "worth at", use alternatives like "valued at", "estimated at", or simply "worth" followed by the amount. For example, instead of "It's worth at $100", say "It's valued at $100" or "It's worth $100".

What is a grammatically correct substitute for the phrase "worth at"?

The most suitable substitutes for "worth at" are phrases like "valued at", "estimated at", or "has a value of". These options provide clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Is it acceptable to use "worth at" in formal writing?

No, it is not recommended to use "worth at" in formal writing. This phrase is grammatically incorrect, and it is better to use more precise and formal alternatives such as "valued at" or "assessed at".

How does the meaning change when I use "valued at" instead of "worth at"?

The meaning remains largely the same, but "valued at" is more precise and grammatically correct. It indicates that a formal or informal valuation process has taken place. Using "valued at" enhances the credibility and clarity of your statement compared to the less formal and technically incorrect "worth at".