Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
without validation
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "without validation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something is being done or accepted without any form of verification or confirmation. Example: "The software will process the data without validation, which may lead to errors in the output."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Of the 123 nsSNPs without validation information, we have currently validated 80 SNPs.
Science
Thus, PSIs should not be compared across jurisdictions without validation because adjustment for data validity is necessary.
Science
While these data support the use of 18S as a suitable control for normalization, it should not be inferred that it was the only valid control in our study, nor should it be used without validation under each experimental condition.
Science
Scales without validation data in Spain were also evaluated on their internal consistency and factorial validity.
Science
The Atlantic's David Graham points out that dumping the document without validation is an abdication of what BuzzFeed, as a media outlet, is supposed to do.
News & Media
And finally, we explore how to improve both the model and the use of the model without validation.
Science
Without validation, it is difficult to ascertain if the cutoffs we intend are the ones we actually select.
It is shown that if the data were to be analyzed without validation by KKT, it can lead to incorrect choice of reaction mechanism or equivalent circuits.
Science
The studies are categorized based on the following characteristics: morphology of the urban area (generic versus real) and methodology (with or without validation study).
"In some ways," the foreigner said, "people here are so used to being without — without stuff, without validation, without contact to the outside world, without a set of standards about how things happen — that sanctions and isolation are normal.
News & Media
It is also shown that scenario-earthquakes developed by disaggregation from the results of a traditional PSHA may not be conservative with respect to energy conservation and should not be used for the design of critical infrastructures without validation.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using models or data, always specify whether they have undergone validation processes to ensure transparency and credibility in your analysis.
Common error
Avoid assuming that data or processes are valid simply because they appear logical. Always indicate when something lacks validation to prevent misinterpretations.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "without validation" functions primarily as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to indicate a condition or manner in which an action is performed or a state exists. It specifies the absence of a validation process, as evidenced by the examples provided by Ludwig.
Frequent in
Science
65%
News & Media
18%
Formal & Business
17%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "without validation" is a grammatically correct and frequently used adverbial phrase that signifies the absence of verification or confirmation. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is commonly used across various domains, particularly in science, news, and formal business settings. It serves as a cautionary note, highlighting potential inaccuracies or unreliability due to the lack of a validation process. To enhance clarity and credibility in writing, it's crucial to specify whether data or models have undergone validation. Alternatives such as "lacking verification", "unconfirmed", and "unsubstantiated" can be used depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
lacking verification
Emphasizes the absence of a process to prove something is true or accurate.
unsubstantiated
Highlights the lack of evidence to support a claim or statement.
unconfirmed
Focuses on the absence of official or authoritative confirmation.
unverified
Indicates that something has not been checked for accuracy or truth.
unauthenticated
Stresses the lack of proof of genuineness or validity.
without corroboration
Highlights the absence of supporting evidence from an independent source.
lacking empirical support
Emphasizes the absence of evidence gathered through observation or experimentation.
without justification
Indicates the absence of a valid reason or explanation.
untested
Highlights the absence of any testing or trials to ensure quality or effectiveness.
without proof
Focuses on the lack of conclusive evidence.
FAQs
How can I use "without validation" in a sentence?
You can use "without validation" to indicate the absence of verification or confirmation in a process, model, or data. For example: "The results were used "without validation", which could lead to inaccurate conclusions."
What are some alternatives to saying "without validation"?
Alternatives include "lacking verification", "unconfirmed", or "unsubstantiated", depending on the specific context.
Is it better to present data "with validation" or "without validation"?
Presenting data "with validation" is always preferable as it increases credibility and reliability. When presenting data ""without validation"", it's crucial to acknowledge the limitations and potential inaccuracies.
What does it mean when something is described as being done "without validation"?
It means that the process or result has not been checked or confirmed for accuracy, reliability, or correctness. This implies a higher risk of errors or uncertainty.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested