without going into detail

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "without going into detail" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to provide a summary or overview without elaborating on specific points. Example: "The project was successful, without going into detail about the challenges we faced along the way."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Then, without going into detail,what would happen?

The Economist

Without going into detail – it was not fine.

The Guardian - Opinion

We do this without going into detail about the underlying C implementation.

Computers & Mathematics with Applications

"I'm getting some pressure from my kids," he said, without going into detail.

The New York Times

Then we had to stop and restart the process again," he said, without going into detail.

The New York Times

"It was downgrading the colored people in politics," he said delicately, without going into detail.

The New Yorker

We have examined this assignment, and, without going into detail, find that it, too, must be denied.

Cornell University

"Yesterday there was some rocket fire from residual jihadist groups in the Gao region," he said, without going into detail.

The New York Times

(Except this: Upon meeting the author of a book you haven't read, "praise it without going into detail").

The New York Times - Books

Ministers offered suggestions that "really might be able to shape some different approaches" he said, without going into detail.

The Guardian

Without going into detail, he said there were elements of the evidence that "did not make sense" to investigators.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Employ this phrase when the specifics are either confidential, irrelevant to the current discussion, or too complex for the audience's current understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "without going into detail" excessively, as it can make your writing seem evasive or lacking in substance. Strive for a balance between providing enough information and maintaining brevity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "without going into detail" functions as a discourse marker, signaling that the speaker or writer is about to provide a summary or overview without including specific information. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and common usage in English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "without going into detail" is a versatile phrase used to indicate a summary or high-level explanation, often when specifics are unnecessary, confidential, or too complex. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and very commonly used across diverse contexts like News & Media and Science. While it’s a useful tool for brevity, overuse can lead to perceptions of evasiveness. Alternatives such as "without elaborating" or "in brief" can add variety to your writing. Using this phrase judiciously enhances clarity and efficiency in communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

without elaborating

Directly indicates a lack of further explanation.

avoiding specifics

Focuses on a deliberate omission of precise details.

in a nutshell

Highlights a compact, simplified explanation.

to put it briefly

Emphasizes summarizing information succinctly.

in general terms

Offers a broad overview without precision.

in brief

Focuses on conciseness and brevity, offering a shorter version.

generally speaking

Offers a broad perspective or overall point.

to summarize

Highlights giving a condensed account of the main points.

skipping the particulars

Highlights omitting certain details.

leaving out the minutiae

Implies the omission of fine or unimportant details.

FAQs

How can I use "without going into detail" in a sentence?

You can use "without going into detail" to introduce a summary or to gloss over sensitive or complex information. For example, "The project succeeded, "without going into detail" about the budget overruns".

What are some alternatives to "without going into detail"?

Alternatives include "without elaborating", "in brief", or "to summarize". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "without going into detail"?

It's appropriate when you want to provide a high-level overview, avoid divulging confidential information, or simplify complex topics for a general audience. Be mindful not to overuse it, as it can sound evasive.

Is it better to say "without going into detail" or "without going into details"?

The singular form, "without going into detail", is generally preferred. While "details" isn't incorrect, "detail" is more common and idiomatic in this expression.