without fault

USAGE SUMMARY

"without fault" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe something or someone that is perfect or flawless. Example: The mechanic fixed my car without fault. It runs like new now.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Service was without fault.

The New York Times

"We played without fault".

The New York Times - Sports

Khannouchi is not without fault.

The New York Times - Sports

No system is without fault.

The Guardian - Opinion

Not that they are without fault.

The New York Times

State governments are not without fault.

The New York Times

Nor are Israeli textbooks without fault.

The Economist

But The Times has not been without fault.

The New York Times

"These things can happen without fault at times".

The New York Times

The manual gearbox, though wondrous, is not entirely without fault.

The New York Times

Without fault finding, I want to assure everyone that my loyalty to Sabbath is intact".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "without fault" to emphasize the complete absence of error or imperfection in a situation, performance, or object. It conveys a high standard of quality and reliability.

Common error

While "without fault" is a valid phrase, avoid using it excessively in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "perfect" or "flawless" may be more appropriate and sound more natural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "without fault" typically functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate the absence of errors, defects, or blame. Ludwig's examples show it describing service, performance, and even abstract concepts like systems and arguments. Ludwig AI confirms it is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "without fault" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to denote a state of perfection or blamelessness. As noted by Ludwig AI, it is considered correct and usable in written English. While versatile, its usage is more common in formal contexts like news and academic writing. To avoid overuse, consider semantically similar alternatives such as "flawless", "impeccable", or "perfect", as appropriate. Ludwig's examples offer a wide variety of applications, solidifying its place as a valuable asset in effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

faultless

Direct synonym, emphasizing the lack of errors or defects.

without error

Directly indicates the absence of mistakes.

flawless

Emphasizes the absence of any imperfections or defects.

impeccable

Highlights a state of being beyond criticism, perfect in every way.

perfect

Indicates a state of completeness and flawlessness.

blameless

Focuses on the absence of guilt or responsibility for wrongdoing.

unblemished

Suggests a purity and lack of any marks or stains, whether literal or figurative.

spotless

Suggests complete purity and cleanliness, both literally and figuratively.

unimpeachable

Highlights a state of being beyond doubt or question, especially in terms of integrity.

irreproachable

Emphasizes behavior or character that is beyond criticism or blame.

FAQs

How can I use "without fault" in a sentence?

You can use "without fault" to describe something that is perfect or flawless. For example, "The service at the restaurant was "without fault"." or "He performed the surgery "without error"".

What's the difference between "without fault" and "flawless"?

While both convey a lack of imperfections, "without fault" often implies a higher standard of reliability and may be used in more formal contexts. "Flawless" can be used more broadly to describe aesthetic perfection.

What can I say instead of "without fault"?

You can use alternatives like "impeccable", "perfect", or "blameless" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say something is "not without fault"?

Yes, saying something is "not without fault" means it has some flaws or imperfections. It's a way of acknowledging shortcomings while perhaps implying that they aren't severe.