without details

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "without details" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
For example, "I cannot remember the story in detail, but I know it happened without details."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

We can't have closure without details".

The Guardian

Other news agencies sent out similar reports on Monday but without details or evidence.

The New York Times

And so the tale, without details to attach it to anything in particular, becomes universal.

The New Yorker

Without details laid out in the legislation, "all of these are within the realm of possibility", she says.

The Guardian

Previously, there were only brief references in the court record, without details, about his desire to offer sensitive information.

The New York Times

Only a few paragraphs described the conditions at the facility, so readers like Ms. Muccino remained without details.

The New York Times

In fact, many economists have said exactly that, and, without details, Mr. Romney can't simply refute them.

The New York Times

He hinted at the idea repeatedly, without details, during a multicity trip last week before he left on vacation.

The New York Times

The way the debt purchases are made — in bulk, without details of the underlying bills — raises another concern.

The New Yorker

But, Lipp concluded, "Without details on what the attorney general's office did, all we can say that we know is that they didn't follow our standards".

The New Yorker

Mr. Bloomberg, perhaps freed to speak out by the long odds against him, is now raising these issues frequently -- though so far without details or proposed solutions.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "without details", ensure the context clearly indicates what information is missing. This prevents ambiguity and helps the reader understand the limitations of the information presented.

Common error

Avoid using "without details" when the reader has no prior knowledge of the subject. Instead, provide a brief overview before stating that specific details are unavailable, clarifying the scope of the missing information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "without details" primarily functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to indicate a lack of specific information. As Ludwig AI pointed out, the expression is used to express missing information, this can be seen in the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "without details" is a common and grammatically sound way to express a lack of specific information. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. As it is used in varied contexts, it's crucial to ensure clarity about what information is missing. While suitable for most registers, its impact can be enhanced by using synonyms like "lacking specifics" or "unspecified" depending on the specific context. With a wide applicability across diverse fields, this phrase proves its high utility in both formal and informal communication scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking specifics

Emphasizes the absence of particular details.

unspecified

Directly indicates that the details have not been stated.

missing particulars

Highlights that certain pieces of information are absent.

devoid of specifics

Strongly conveys the complete absence of any specific information.

without elaboration

Highlights the absence of further explanation or expansion.

vague and general

Focuses on the lack of clarity and the broad nature of the information.

leaving out the specifics

Highlights the act of intentionally not including particular details.

sketchy on the facts

Suggests incomplete or unreliable factual information.

in broad strokes

Implies that only the main points are covered, omitting finer points.

omitting the finer points

Specifically points out the absence of subtle aspects or nuances.

FAQs

How can I use "without details" in a sentence?

You can use "without details" to indicate that information is lacking or unspecified. For example: "The report mentioned the incident "without details" about the cause."

What's a formal alternative to "without details"?

A more formal alternative could be "lacking in specifics" or "unspecified". For example: "The agreement was presented "without details", making it difficult to assess its implications."

Is it better to say "without details" or "lacking details"?

Both "without details" and "lacking details" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice depends on stylistic preference, although "lacking details" might be perceived as slightly more formal. You could also use "devoid of specifics".

What does it mean when someone says something is "without details"?

When someone says something is ""without details"", it means that the information provided is incomplete or lacks specific information. This can be intentional or unintentional, but it indicates a lack of thoroughness.