without depth

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "without depth" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that lacks complexity, substance, or thoroughness. Example: "The analysis of the issue was superficial and ultimately left the audience feeling unsatisfied, as it was presented without depth."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

47 human-written examples

Their salsa may be a thin tomato water without depth.

The Washington Post

That, of course, is just the point the deconstructionists tirelessly belabor: All is surface without depth.

The New York Times

For all its shiny surface, "Mauritius" follows the old boulevard recipe of complication without depth.

The New Yorker

His memories of the family apartment in the 1950s and 1960s showed a life without depth.

The Guardian - Books

Vitti was the perfect embodiment of his coldly luminous vision of profundity without depth, of intellect blocked from emotion.

The New Yorker

Fitts' model explained the total movement time (for targets without depth r2 = .72; for targets with depth r2 = .72).72

Human Movement Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

Noise-free data were simulated with and without depth-of-interaction (DOI) information, and reconstructed for uniform, Defrise, Derenzo, and Zubal brain phantoms.

EJNMMI Physics

One example is endoscopic fluorescence imaging of the gastrointestinal track for cancer screening/diagnosis [ 10], where, generally only surface images with low resolution are generated without depth-resolved high-resolution tissue microstructure information.

Biomedical Optics Express

His prose is engaging without sacrificing depth or rigor.

Cornell University

"Maybe we can get by without the depth you'd like to have," said Torre.

The New York Times - Sports

"Retailers like exposure without great depth, so this is a fabulous retail building," Mr. Wennett said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "without depth", consider the specific quality you believe is missing and select a more precise term if possible, such as "superficial" or "lacking insight".

Common error

Avoid using "without depth" as a generic criticism; specify what lacks depth. For example, instead of saying "the argument was without depth", state "the argument failed to address key counterarguments".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "without depth" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or verb to indicate a lack of profundity, complexity, or thoroughness. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "without depth" is a grammatically sound and usable prepositional phrase that indicates a lack of complexity, substance, or thoroughness. While Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, it's important to consider whether a more specific term like "superficial" or "lacking insight" might be more appropriate. It is most commonly used in news, science, and academic contexts, and is generally neutral in register. Though sometimes abstract, the key to employing it effectively is to clearly define what specifically is deemed to be lacking depth.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking substance

Focuses on the absence of meaningful content or value.

without substance

Focuses on the lack of material or importance.

superficial

Emphasizes a lack of thoroughness and engagement with the subject matter.

shallow

Highlights the absence of intellectual or emotional profundity.

lacking profundity

Directly addresses the absence of deep insight or understanding.

lacking complexity

Highlights the absence of intricate or detailed elements.

devoid of meaning

Stresses the absence of significance or purpose.

skin-deep

Highlights a characteristic that is only on the surface and not profound.

wanting in insight

Indicates a deficiency in understanding or perception.

simplistic

Implies an oversimplified and inadequate approach.

FAQs

How can I use "without depth" in a sentence?

You can use "without depth" to describe something lacking complexity, substance, or thoroughness. For example, "The analysis was superficial and presented the information "without depth"".

What are some alternatives to "without depth"?

Alternatives include "lacking substance", "superficial", or "shallow". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "lacking depth" or "without depth"?

Both "lacking depth" and "without depth" are grammatically correct and convey similar meanings. The choice often depends on stylistic preference or the specific flow of the sentence.

What's the difference between "superficial" and "without depth"?

"Superficial" implies a focus on the surface and a lack of thoroughness. "Without depth" can refer to a lack of complexity, substance, or understanding, encompassing a broader range of deficiencies. While similar, "superficial" emphasizes the surface-level aspect more strongly.