Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

without consequences

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"without consequences" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which an action has no negative results. For example, "He chose to disobey his parents' instructions but did it without consequences."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

True, I.V.F. has not been without consequences.

News & Media

The New York Times

In other words, sex without consequences.

News & Media

The New York Times

It is not without consequences.

News & Media

The Guardian

The decision was not without consequences.

Bad things happen, but not without consequences.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Another said celebrities often acted without consequences.

Withdraw we may, but it will not be without consequences.

News & Media

The New Yorker

To be certain, diversification has not occurred without consequences.

News & Media

The New York Times

The Egyptian revolution has not been without consequences for her.

Steroids stretch those natural limits, but not without consequences.

__ Both very tough and very lenient raters operate without consequences.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "without consequences", ensure that the context clearly indicates which actions or decisions are free from repercussions. This prevents ambiguity and strengthens the clarity of your statement.

Common error

Avoid assuming that an action "without consequences" means it will never have repercussions. Focus on the immediate or reasonably foreseeable results. Overlooking potential long-term effects can weaken your argument or analysis.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "without consequences" functions primarily as an adverbial phrase. It modifies verbs or clauses to indicate that an action or situation occurs without any resulting penalties, negative outcomes, or significant effects. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Academia

18%

Science

18%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "without consequences" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe situations lacking negative repercussions, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Appearing frequently in news and media, academic writing, and scientific publications, its neutral register makes it suitable for diverse contexts. While it denotes the absence of immediate or foreseeable adverse outcomes, it's crucial to consider potential long-term effects and ethical implications. Alternatives such as "without repercussions" or "with impunity" offer nuanced variations, emphasizing different aspects of the lack of accountability.

FAQs

How can I use "without consequences" in a sentence?

You can use "without consequences" to describe situations where an action does not lead to any negative results. For example, "He made a risky decision, but it turned out to be "without consequences"."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "without consequences"?

Alternatives to "without consequences" include "without repercussions", "with impunity", or "free from penalty" depending on the specific context.

Is it always a good thing when actions are "without consequences"?

Not necessarily. While avoiding negative results is often desirable, a lack of consequences can also suggest a lack of accountability or that the action was insignificant. The ethical implications depend heavily on the specific scenario.

What is the difference between "without consequences" and "without repercussions"?

While similar, "consequences" generally refers to the direct results of an action, whereas "repercussions" often implies indirect or far-reaching effects. Therefore, "without repercussions" can suggest that although there are immediate outcomes, there are no wider negative effects.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: