withdrawn with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "withdrawn with" is not correct in standard written English and may cause confusion.
It is unclear without context what the intended meaning is, but it could be interpreted as referring to something that has been taken back or removed in conjunction with something else. Example: "The application was withdrawn with the understanding that further review would be necessary."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Muntari's accreditation for the 2014 World Cup has been withdrawn with immediate effect.

The Guardian - Sport

His teachers explained that he was severely withdrawn, with a stutter.

The Guardian - Film

Boateng's accreditation for the 2014 World Cup has been withdrawn with immediate effect.

The Guardian - Sport

Later in the year the core may be withdrawn with a scoop".

The New York Times - Food

"As a result, Kompany's three-match suspension has been withdrawn with immediate effect".

Independent

But the SNP said the legal action had now been withdrawn "with the agreement of both parties".

The Guardian

Boseman is quiet, watchful, often withdrawn, with a wary intelligence that he releases through glances and gestures.

The New Yorker

"We are unaware of any significant amount of money being withdrawn with regards to this," he said.

The Guardian - Business

They had already lost the services of Michu, who was withdrawn with a twisted ankle in the second half.

The Guardian - Sport

MG: Vermeer's people are reticent and withdrawn, with Rembrandt's you have the impression that you can read their thoughts.

The Guardian - Arts

As the monkeys aged, those in the first group were the most withdrawn, with poor social skills.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "withdrawn with", which is often grammatically awkward, consider using more precise and standard phrasing like "withdrawn due to", "retracted because of", or "removed along with" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "withdrawn with" when a clearer causal or accompanying relationship can be expressed. For example, instead of saying "The offer was withdrawn with the new evidence", say "The offer was withdrawn because of the new evidence" or "The offer was withdrawn along with the previous terms."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "withdrawn with" functions primarily to indicate that something has been retracted or removed, often in conjunction with another action or condition. Ludwig AI suggests that its usage can be ambiguous and proposes more precise alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Academia

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "withdrawn with" frequently appears across diverse sources, including news, media, and scientific publications, yet it often leads to grammatical ambiguity. Ludwig AI marks it as potentially incorrect, suggesting that while common, it isn't always the most precise or grammatically sound choice. Alternatives like "withdrawn due to", "removed along with", or more direct rephrasing can enhance clarity and precision. While "withdrawn with" isn't strictly wrong, writers should consider more explicit options to avoid potential misinterpretations. Its varied usage across different contexts implies a broad, but sometimes imprecise, application. Considering other options is valuable for precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

retracted along with

Focuses on the act of taking something back in conjunction with something else.

removed together with

Emphasizes the act of taking away or eliminating something jointly.

taken back along with

Highlights a simple act of retrieval together with another item.

revoked in conjunction with

Highlights the cancellation or annulment of something in connection with another element.

rescinded along with

Similar to retracted, but suggests a more formal or official cancellation.

repealed in tandem with

Indicates that something is abolished in coordination with something else.

isolated in combination with

Emphasis is on the act of isolating or separating something and uniting it with another action or object

extracted in partnership with

Highlights an act of extracting but in collaboration with another.

separated in alignment with

Highlights an act of separating but in accordance with something else

retreated in accordance with

Emphasis on the act of withdrawing but in agreement to something else.

FAQs

What does "withdrawn with" mean and why is it confusing?

"Withdrawn with" is a phrase that implies something was taken back or removed in conjunction with something else, but it often lacks clarity. It's more precise to use phrases like "withdrawn due to", "retracted because of", or "removed along with" to avoid ambiguity.

What are some alternatives to "withdrawn with" that are grammatically correct?

Grammatically sound alternatives include "retracted with", "removed with", or rewording the sentence to use prepositions like 'due to' or 'because of' for clearer meaning.

How can I rephrase a sentence that uses "withdrawn with" to improve clarity?

Consider restructuring the sentence to specify the reason for the withdrawal or the item that accompanied it. For example, instead of "The application was withdrawn with the update", try "The application was withdrawn because of the update" or "The application and its supporting documents were withdrawn."

Is "withdrawn with" considered formal or informal language?

While it appears in various sources, "withdrawn with" is not considered standard formal language. Using clearer and more precise alternatives will improve your writing, especially in professional and academic contexts.