removed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "removed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the process of taking something away or eliminating it in conjunction with another item or method. Example: "The stain was removed with a special cleaning solution."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

DNA was removed with RapidOut DNA Removal Kit (Thermo Scientific).

AMB Express

Still, impediments are being removed with speed.

The New York Times

How can I be cold, distant, removed with Andrés?

The Guardian - Sport

Now, Bhatti's gag has been removed with a flourish.

The Guardian

The nerve endings were removed with the tissue.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Then Martínez was removed, with the pitch count at 123.

The New York Times - Sports

Organs are removed with respect by specialist doctors.

Independent

Color is applied in washes and then removed with bleach.

The New York Times - Arts

samples removed with each dilution.

Geochemical Transactions

That obstacle is removed with this alliance.

TechCrunch

Excess acid was removed with ethanol.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a process where something is removed, ensure that the tool or method used is clearly specified after the phrase "removed with".

Common error

Ensure you specify what the object or substance was "removed with". Saying something was simply "removed" lacks clarity and leaves the reader wondering how it was done.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "removed with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an object or substance has been taken away or eliminated through the use of a specific tool, agent, or method. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase correctly specifies how something was taken away.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

35%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "removed with" is a grammatically sound and versatile expression used to describe the act of taking something away using a specific tool or method. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase correctly specifies how something was taken away. It finds frequent application in scientific, news, and general contexts. When using this phrase, be sure to clearly specify what is doing the removing to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "eliminated by means of" or "extracted using" for varying degrees of formality. With its widespread usage and clear meaning, mastering "removed with" will enhance your writing precision and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

eliminated by means of

This alternative focuses on the method of elimination, using a more formal tone.

separated through

This focuses on the act of separation, often used in technical or scientific scenarios.

extracted using

This phrase emphasizes the extraction process, often used in scientific or technical contexts.

expunged via

This term provides a more formal and emphatic way to express removal, often in legal or official contexts.

cleared away via

This suggests a clearing or cleaning action, implying the removal of something unwanted.

withdrawn by

This option is used when emphasizing who or what is performing the removal.

taken off with the aid of

This alternative specifies that assistance was used, highlighting the helping agent.

dislodged utilizing

This suggests something has been displaced and then removed, often with a specific tool.

got rid of using

This is a more informal option, suggesting the action of discarding something.

detached by the use of

This alternative is useful when the emphasis is on the tool or method used for detaching something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "removed with" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, you could use phrases like "eliminated by means of", "extracted using", or "separated through". These alternatives, like "eliminated by means of", often appear in academic or technical writing.

What's a simpler way to say "removed with" in everyday language?

In casual contexts, consider using phrases such as "got rid of using" or "taken off with the aid of". These options are less formal but still clearly convey the meaning of something being taken away or eliminated.

Is it grammatically correct to say "removed by" instead of "removed with"?

Yes, both are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different connotations. "Removed with" emphasizes the instrument or method used, while "removed by" emphasizes the agent or cause. For example, "The stain was removed with a solvent" versus "The stain was removed by the cleaning service".

What are some examples of items that are commonly "removed with" another item?

Many things can be “removed with” something. For instance, "DNA was removed with RapidOut DNA Removal Kit", "Color is applied in washes and then removed with bleach", or "Excess acid was removed with ethanol".