Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
with surprise
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"with surprise" is correct in written English.
You can use it to describe someone's reaction to something unexpected. For example, "Sam gasped with surprise when he saw a giraffe in the living room."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Pun generation with surprise.
Academia
His father reacted with surprise.
News & Media
"We cried with surprise.
News & Media
I looked at him with surprise.
News & Media
Reagan appeared to be numb with surprise.
News & Media
"Jose Canseco!" he said with surprise.
News & Media
Skinner's erudition was met with surprise.
News & Media
The staff listened with surprise.
News & Media
Obinze was stung with surprise.
News & Media
"Eurotrash?" he said, with surprise.
News & Media
The delay was met with surprise.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "with surprise" to describe a reaction to something unexpected, emphasizing the feeling of astonishment or wonder.
Common error
While "with surprise" is grammatically correct, avoid overuse in formal contexts. Opt for more nuanced expressions like "in astonishment" or "to their amazement" to maintain a professional tone.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "with surprise" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb to describe the manner in which an action is performed or a state is experienced. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and provides numerous examples of its usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
56%
Academia
23%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Science
5%
Wiki
3%
Reference
3%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "with surprise" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to describe a reaction of astonishment or unexpectedness. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears frequently in diverse contexts, particularly in news and media, and is suitable for both formal and informal communication. While versatile, it's advisable to consider more nuanced alternatives, such as "in astonishment" or "to their amazement", especially in highly formal writing, to enhance precision and avoid repetition. Understanding the contexts where this phrase is most effective can significantly improve writing clarity and impact.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
in astonishment
Focuses on the feeling of great surprise and wonder.
in amazement
Highlights the sense of being filled with wonder and astonishment.
in wonder
Emphasizes a feeling of surprise mixed with admiration.
in disbelief
Implies a strong sense of incredulity at what is happening.
taken aback
Suggests a sudden shock or surprise that causes temporary confusion.
caught off guard
Indicates that someone was surprised because they were not expecting something.
stunned
Describes being shocked or dazed, often due to surprise.
dumbfounded
Implies being so surprised that one is temporarily speechless.
flabbergasted
Suggests being utterly astonished and surprised.
startled
Focuses on a sudden and unexpected surprise.
FAQs
How can I use "with surprise" in a sentence?
You can use "with surprise" to describe how someone reacts to an unexpected event. For example, "She looked at him "with surprise" when he announced his retirement unexpectedly".
What are some alternatives to saying "with surprise"?
Alternatives to "with surprise" include "in amazement", "in wonder", or "in astonishment", depending on the nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "with surprised" instead of "with surprise"?
No, "with surprised" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is "with surprise", where "surprise" functions as a noun describing the feeling or reaction.
What's the difference between reacting "with surprise" and being "surprised by" something?
Reacting "with surprise" describes the manner of reaction, emphasizing the emotional response. Being "surprised by" something focuses on the cause of the reaction, highlighting the unexpected event or information. For example: "She reacted "with surprise"", compared to "She was surprised by the sudden announcement".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested