with examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with examples" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when you want to clarify or illustrate a point by providing specific instances. For example, "The theory can be explained with examples from real life." Alternative expressions include "for instance," "such as," and "like."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Back up statements with examples.

Independent

The report was packed with examples.

The New York Times

America is dotted with examples of reform.

The Economist

"Wrong" bristles with examples and lists.

The New York Times - Books

Support your view with examples taken from the jacket copy.

The New Yorker

Barry's work is filled with examples of ancestry.

The Guardian

Kanfer's narrative overflows with examples of doppelg<diamond=ngery.

The New York Times - Books

Be sure to support your position with examples.

The New York Times

But they are good speeches, bristling with examples and insights.

The New York Times - Books

He amuses himself with examples of repression's unintended consequences.

The New York Times - Arts

"Cognitive Surplus" teems with examples of collaborative action.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In business communications, use "with examples" to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid making broad statements without providing supporting examples. Claims lacking specific illustrations can weaken your argument and lose credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with examples" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun. It serves to introduce or indicate the presence of illustrative instances that support a preceding statement. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's a grammatically sound construct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with examples" is a grammatically correct and versatile prepositional phrase used to enhance clarity and credibility in writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely applicable across diverse contexts, particularly in science, news, and formal communications. To maximize its impact, provide specific, relevant illustrations that directly support your claims. While highly versatile, remember that alternatives like "for instance" or "such as" might be more appropriate depending on the context and desired level of detail. By avoiding overgeneralizations and providing concrete examples, you can significantly strengthen your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with instances

Emphasizes specific occurrences or cases.

with illustrations

Focuses on visual or descriptive clarifications.

with case studies

Highlights in-depth analyses of particular situations.

with demonstrations

Suggests a practical showing or display of something.

with precedents

Implies reliance on established patterns or legal rulings.

with supporting data

Highlights the presence of evidence and figures.

with concrete evidence

Stresses the tangibility and reliability of the proof.

with specific details

Focuses on the inclusion of particular and precise information.

for instance

Introduces a single example.

such as

Introduces one or more examples.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "with examples" in a sentence?

Incorporate "with examples" after a statement or concept that requires clarification, ensuring the examples directly support and illustrate your point. For instance, "The theory can be explained "with examples" from real life".

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "with examples"?

You can use alternatives like "for instance", "such as", "to illustrate", or "with instances" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to start a sentence with "with examples"?

While grammatically permissible, starting a sentence with "with examples" is less common. It's often better to integrate it within the sentence to maintain a smoother flow. For example, "The document illustrates the process "with illustrations"" is preferable to "With examples, the process is illustrated".

How does "with examples" differ from "for example"?

"For example" introduces a specific instance, while ""with examples"" suggests a broader set of illustrations. Use "for example" when providing one or two clear instances, and "with examples" when offering a more comprehensive range of illustrations.