with changes

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with changes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been modified or altered from its original form. Example: "The document has been reviewed and submitted with changes to improve clarity and accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We deal with changes in energy.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

But it also coincided with changes in his friendships.

The New Yorker

The answer begins with changes to our chemistry.

The New Yorker

Even with changes and technological developments, spectrum management remains difficult.

The New York Times - Tech

With changes in benefits, many people are suffering".

The Guardian - Business

"I'm just disagreeing with changes that the others are making".

The New York Times

Cameron starts with changes to the benefit system.

The Guardian

Wood expands and contracts with changes in temperature, Humphreys said.

The Washington Post

This post has been updated with changes to its graphics.

The Washington Post

With changes occurring constantly, automated quality assurance is paramount.

MIT Technology Review

Such a shift may be associated with changes in content.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "with changes" when you want to indicate that something has been updated or altered from its original state.

Common error

Avoid using "with changes" without specifying what those changes are. Always provide context to clarify the modifications.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with changes" functions as a prepositional phrase, often acting as an adverbial modifier to indicate that an action or state is influenced by modifications. Ludwig AI validates its common use across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Academia

26%

Science

22%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with changes" is a versatile prepositional phrase widely used to indicate modifications or alterations, as validated by Ludwig. Its grammatical correctness and frequent occurrence across various sources such as news, academia, and science, make it a reliable choice for expressing that something has been updated or revised. While the phrase is generally neutral in register, being specific about what those changes are helps maintain clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with modifications

Replaces "changes" with a more formal synonym, emphasizing adjustments made.

with alterations

Similar to 'modifications', but can imply a more significant or fundamental shift.

with revisions

Specifically highlights corrections or improvements made to something.

incorporating changes

Focuses on the act of including modifications into a system or plan.

reflecting changes

Indicates that something demonstrates or mirrors the modifications made.

considering changes

Emphasizes the act of taking modifications into account.

subject to changes

Highlights that something is liable to be modified.

in light of changes

Indicates that something is being done or viewed based on new modifications.

as a result of changes

Focuses on the outcome or consequence of modifications.

taking into account changes

Similar to 'considering changes' but slightly more formal.

FAQs

How can I use "with changes" in a sentence?

You can use "with changes" to indicate that something has been modified or altered. For example, "The report was updated "with changes" throughout the document."

What phrases are similar to "with changes"?

Alternatives include "with modifications", "with revisions", or "incorporating changes", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "with changes"?

Yes, "with changes" is grammatically correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something has been modified or updated.

What is the difference between "with changes" and "with alterations"?

While both phrases indicate modification, "with alterations" /s/with+alterations might imply more significant or fundamental modifications compared to "with changes".