with a capacity of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with a capacity of" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is used to describe or quantify something, typically a measure of size or storage capacity. For example: The auditorium was filled to capacity with a capacity of 2,000 people.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

A system with a capacity of three kilowatts would have 24 panels covering 240 square feet.

The New York Times

The cars, with a capacity of 125 people each, ferry passengers between Manhattan and Roosevelt Island.

The New York Times

Only 12 chairs were filled in a restaurant with a capacity of 500 guests.

The New York Times

The pavilion, with a capacity of 200, is to have 18 benches in a horseshoe configuration.

The New York Times

"Brown coal-fired plants with a capacity of 2.7 gigawatts will be mothballed.

The Guardian

But it had a rented space with a capacity of just 75 for only five weeks.

The New York Times

Operations have now dwindled to 37 units with a capacity of 2,000 patients.

The New York Times

You will need a large, lidded, heavy-based casserole with a capacity of 3.45 litres.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

With a capacity of only 72 people a day, reserving as early as possible is recommended.

The New York Times - Travel

Also, with a capacity of 1,560, the Gewandhaus was too little.

The New York Times - Arts

The Plainview mill, with a capacity of 225,000 metric tons a year, opened in 1989.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with a capacity of", ensure the unit of measurement (e.g., liters, people, megawatts) is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The stadium has a capacity of 70,000 people."

Common error

Avoid using "with a capacity of" without specifying the units. Saying "the container has a capacity of 50" is unclear; instead, specify "the container has a capacity of 50 liters".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with a capacity of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, providing information about its maximum holding or production ability. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used. It specifies a quantifiable attribute.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Wiki

18%

Science

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with a capacity of" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to specify the maximum holding or production capability of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, from news reports to scientific articles. Its neutral register and high frequency make it a reliable choice for clear and precise communication. Ensure you include the unit of measurement for clarity. Alternatives like "able to accommodate" or "capable of holding" can be used depending on the specific context, but "with a capacity of" remains a straightforward and widely understood option.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has a capability of

Highlights the ability to do something.

has a volume of

Refers specifically to the amount of space occupied.

with an ability to hold

Similar meaning, but structured differently.

able to accommodate

Focuses on the ability to provide space or resources.

capable of holding

Emphasizes the physical ability to contain something.

designed to hold

Highlights the intended purpose for a specific volume.

sized to contain

Highlights the adjusted measures to fit some object.

equipped to handle

Focuses on the capability to manage a certain quantity or load.

built to house

Refers to the structure in order to protect or give accomodation.

possessing the space for

Indicates availability of room or area.

FAQs

How can I use "with a capacity of" in a sentence?

Use "with a capacity of" to specify the maximum amount something can hold or produce. For instance, "The reservoir is designed with a capacity of 10 million gallons".

What are some alternatives to using "with a capacity of"?

You can use alternatives such as "able to accommodate", "capable of holding", or "has a volume of", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "has a capacity of" or "with a capacity of"?

Both "has a capacity of" and "with a capacity of" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably, though "with a capacity of" is more common when describing a feature or specification. Ultimately, it is about style and readability.

What's the difference between "capacity" and "volume"?

"Capacity" refers to the maximum amount something can contain, while "volume" refers to the amount of space something occupies. A container designed "with a capacity of" 1 liter may only have a volume of 0.8 liters if it's partially filled.