wins to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "wins to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not a standard expression and may confuse readers due to its lack of context or clarity. Example: "The team wins to secure their place in the finals." (This example is awkward and unclear.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Dimitrov also wins to love.

The Guardian - Sport

35 wins to 29 wins.

The Guardian

He needed only two more wins to retain the title.

The New Yorker

We need six wins to the end of the season.

Independent

Eventually, Davenport wins to hold on to that break advantage.

The Guardian - Sport

"We need 15 wins to be a champion.

The New York Times - Sports

In any case, economic reality may force whoever wins to continue the current administration's conservative policies.

The Economist

Djokovic, however, leads their head-to-head record by 19 wins to nine.

Independent

Oldham lead with 14 wins to Everton's 13, with 12 draws being played out.

Independent

The Spurs 47-100) need three wins to match last season's total.

The New York Times - Sports

For what it's worth, the teams traded low-scoring wins to split their two-game series.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating purpose, use established phrases such as "in order to", "so as to", or "for the purpose of" instead of the less common "wins to" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. For example, instead of "We need wins to progress," use "We need wins in order to progress."

Common error

Avoid using "wins to" as a direct purpose connector. This construction is not standard English and can lead to confusion. Instead, opt for more conventional phrases like "in order to", "so that", or "with the aim of" to express purpose clearly and effectively.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "wins to" functions as a purpose connector, though it's considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as non-standard. This phrase is intended to link the act of winning with a subsequent objective or result.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

16%

Wiki

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "wins to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. While it appears in a limited number of contexts, primarily in news and media, Ludwig AI identifies it as a non-standard expression. To clearly and correctly express the purpose of achieving wins, it's best to use alternatives like "wins in order to", "wins aimed at", or "wins so that". Avoiding "wins to" will ensure clarity and professionalism in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

victories in order to

This alternative explicitly states the purpose behind achieving victories, providing clearer grammatical structure.

wins for the purpose of

This phrase clearly expresses the intention or goal that the wins are meant to accomplish, enhancing clarity.

victories aimed at

This option highlights that the victories are specifically targeted towards achieving a particular outcome or goal.

wins designed to

This alternative emphasizes that the wins are strategically planned or intended to achieve a specific result.

victories intended for

This phrase underscores the intended use or purpose of the victories, focusing on the planned outcome.

wins with the objective of

This option specifies the objective or aim that the wins are meant to fulfill, adding a layer of intentionality.

victories geared towards

This phrase suggests that the victories are specifically adapted or directed to achieve a particular goal.

wins in an effort to

This alternative highlights the effort or attempt being made through the wins to achieve a desired result.

victories so as to

This phrase directly indicates the purpose or reason for achieving the victories, providing a concise and formal alternative.

wins to facilitate

This option emphasizes the role of the wins in making something easier or more likely to happen, focusing on enabling a specific outcome.

FAQs

How can I correctly express the purpose of achieving wins?

Instead of using the non-standard phrase "wins to", use more grammatically correct alternatives such as "wins in order to", "wins so that", or "wins with the aim of" to clearly indicate your intended purpose.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when discussing wins and objectives?

A common mistake is using unconventional phrases like "wins to" which may not be widely understood or grammatically accepted. Always opt for standard English constructions to ensure clarity and avoid potential misinterpretations.

Is "wins to" grammatically correct in formal writing?

No, "wins to" is generally not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. It's better to use established phrases like "wins in order to" or "wins for the purpose of".

What alternatives can I use to "wins to" to sound more professional?

To sound more professional, replace "wins to" with alternatives such as "wins aimed at", "wins intended for", or "wins geared towards".