will lack

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "will lack" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something will be missing or deficient in the future. Example: "If we do not allocate enough resources, the project will lack the necessary support to succeed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

The Scottish government will lack this power.

The Economist

His successor will lack that option.

The Economist

And then the Edict will lack teeth".

The New York Times - Magazine

�� We need not fear that OLC will lack for clients".

The Guardian

Otherwise a finding exonerating the state will lack credibility.

The Guardian - Opinion

That committee will lack all credibility if he stays.

The Guardian

But what the Twitterers will lack is a clear vision.

The New York Times

They will lack his poetry and romance, but more than this, they will lack the life that so incautiously informed them.

The New York Times - Magazine

"President Fujimori can declare himself the winner, but his government will lack credibility and legitimacy".

The New York Times

Even then, analysts will lack solid comparisons with the earlier performance of the Prudential unit.

The New York Times

Unlike mild narcissists, they will lack empathy and treat people as objects to achieve their ambitions.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the tone of your writing; while "will lack" is versatile, synonyms like "will be deficient in" or "will be without" may suit more formal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "will lack" repeatedly in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "won't have" to maintain a natural flow.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "will lack" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating a future state of deficiency or absence. It's used to express that something will not possess a certain quality, resource, or characteristic. As indicated by Ludwig, it is considered grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

22%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "will lack" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to express a future deficiency. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science contexts, it serves to forecast shortcomings or warn about potential absences. While versatile, consider its register and explore alternatives like "will be without" or "will be deficient in" for enhanced precision or to avoid repetition. Be mindful of the context and tone, opting for simpler phrases in informal settings. By understanding its nuances and alternatives, you can effectively communicate future deficiencies in various writing styles.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

will be deficient in

Emphasizes a specific inadequacy or shortage.

will be without

Indicates a complete absence of something.

will not have

A more straightforward and common way to express the absence of something.

will be missing

Highlights that something is expected but not present.

will be short of

Implies a quantity that is less than required.

will fall short

Suggests a failure to meet a certain standard or expectation.

will prove inadequate

Focuses on the inability to fulfill a specific need or purpose.

will be devoid of

Emphasizes a complete emptiness or absence of a quality.

will be bereft of

Similar to "devoid of", but with a slightly more formal or literary tone.

will be wanting in

Indicates a deficiency in a particular attribute or characteristic.

FAQs

How can I use "will lack" in a sentence?

Use "will lack" to indicate a future deficiency or absence. For example, "Without proper funding, the project "will lack" the necessary resources".

What are some alternatives to using "will lack"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "will be without", "will be deficient in", or "will not have".

Is there a difference between "will lack" and "will be missing"?

While both indicate an absence, ""will lack"" often implies a deficiency in something necessary, while "will be missing" simply states that something is absent or expected but not present.

Can "will lack" be used in formal writing?

Yes, ""will lack"" is suitable for formal writing. However, consider more precise alternatives like "will be deficient in" or "will be without" for enhanced clarity.