widespread concurrence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "widespread concurrence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where there is a general agreement or consensus among a large number of people or groups. Example: "The recent survey showed widespread concurrence among experts regarding the need for climate action."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

That was the concurrence.

The New York Times

A creepy concurrence.

The Economist

Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined the concurrence.

The New York Times

Justice Breyer also wrote a separate concurrence.

The New York Times

This concurrence was bound to happen.

The Guardian - Opinion

With his concurrence, McNee ordered the assault.

The Washington Post

Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel A. Alito Jr. joined Justice Breyer's concurrence.

The New York Times

Bork wrote a seventy-five-page concurrence.

The New Yorker

She said that "everything had his concurrence".

The New York Times

None wrote a concurrence or dissent.

The New York Times

It is the only situation of concurrence.

Solar Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for a formal tone, "widespread concurrence" effectively communicates a strong sense of agreement. However, consider your audience; simpler terms like "broad agreement" or "general consensus" may be more accessible.

Common error

While "widespread concurrence" is grammatically sound, avoid using it in contexts where simpler language would suffice. Overly formal phrasing can make your writing seem pretentious or inaccessible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "widespread concurrence" primarily functions as a noun phrase, where "widespread" modifies the noun "concurrence". It describes the extent or scope of an agreement or alignment, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "widespread concurrence" is a grammatically correct phrase used to denote a broad agreement or consensus. Although Ludwig identifies it as valid, its frequency is low. It tends to appear in more formal or academic contexts. When writing, consider the tone and choose simpler alternatives like "broad agreement" or "general consensus" for wider accessibility. While semantically strong, using simpler terms in informal context may make your writing accessible to a wider audience.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

broad agreement

Replaces "widespread concurrence" with a more common term for general agreement.

general consensus

Substitutes the original phrase with a term emphasizing a collective agreement.

universal accord

Implies a more complete and unified agreement than the original phrase.

extensive alignment

Focuses on the alignment of opinions or positions across a large group.

common understanding

Highlights the shared comprehension and acceptance of a concept or idea.

prevailing view

Indicates the dominant or most accepted perspective on a matter.

overall harmony

Suggests a state of agreement and cooperation across a wide spectrum.

collective approval

Emphasizes the approval or endorsement by a large number of individuals.

shared perspective

Highlights the common viewpoint or outlook among a group.

accepted wisdom

Implies a commonly held belief or understanding that is widely accepted as true.

FAQs

How can I use "widespread concurrence" in a sentence?

You can use "widespread concurrence" to indicate a broad agreement or consensus on a particular topic. For example: "There is "widespread concurrence" among scientists regarding the need for climate action".

What are some alternatives to "widespread concurrence"?

You can use alternatives like "broad agreement", "general consensus", or "universal accord", depending on the context and the nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "widespread concurrence"?

Use "widespread concurrence" in formal or academic writing where you want to emphasize the extensive nature of an agreement. In more casual contexts, simpler alternatives might be more suitable.

Is "widespread concurrence" the same as "general agreement"?

While similar, "widespread concurrence" often implies a stronger and more pervasive agreement than "general agreement". The choice between the two depends on the specific degree of agreement you wish to convey.