whose exposure

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "whose exposure" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the exposure of a person or entity in various contexts, such as discussing risks, experiences, or visibility. Example: "The study focused on individuals whose exposure to the substance was significantly higher than average."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Riddy takes perhaps one photograph, whose exposure might be half a second or half an hour.

The Guardian - Arts

"I felt exposed," said Cink, whose exposure does not approximate Woods's.

The New York Times - Sports

It certainly rescued many commercial banks, whose exposure toward the Greek state was substantial by the first quarter of 2010.

The Guardian - Business

The top-floor temporary exhibition space will have two skylights whose exposure can be modified with shades and panels.

The New York Times - Arts

Threshold the image, setting all pixels whose exposure is less than 400 to a value of 0.018.

Harvard University

These cryptic sites include various FN self-assembly sites whose exposure is needed to induce FN fibrillogenesis52.

Nature

The move weighed on Wall Street, particularly banks, whose exposure to the debt crisis in Europe is unclear.

The New York Times

Only 1 percent named Mr. Navalny, whose exposure is through Twitter and his blogs, Navalny.ru and Rospil.info.info

The New York Times

Besides that, how would "My Friend Flicka" read to a child whose exposure to horses is so limited that he doesn't know a fetlock from a forelock?

The New Yorker

The initial purchase of the timberland exemplified the commingling of the Rigas family's finances with Adelphia's, whose exposure has brought the company to the precipice.

The New York Times

Analysts say the situation has calmed down enough for individual investors to put money into utilities, especially companies whose exposure in California is limited.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "whose exposure", ensure the noun it modifies is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify "the company whose exposure to the market is limited" rather than just "the company whose exposure...".

Common error

Avoid using "whose exposure" when you mean "who was exposed". "Whose" indicates possession, so ensure it logically connects the exposure to the noun it modifies. For example, instead of "the patient whose exposure to the virus", consider "the patient who was exposed to the virus" if the latter is what you mean.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "whose exposure" functions as a relative determiner indicating possession or a close relationship between a noun and the concept of exposure. It introduces a clause that modifies the noun, specifying something about the subject's experience with exposure as demonstrated by the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

32%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "whose exposure" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase used to establish a connection between a subject and the experience of exposure. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is versatile, appearing in varied contexts from academic research and scientific studies to news reporting. Its neutral to formal register makes it suitable for professional discourse while its strong usage in everyday language makes it accessible. When writing, remember that "whose exposure" should be used to denote a possessive relationship; otherwise, rephrase the expression. Its frequency across various sources underscores its importance and reliability in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

people impacted by

Highlights the consequences of the exposure on people.

with exposure to whom

Reverses the structure to emphasize the act of exposing someone to a person.

individuals affected by

Emphasizes the impact or effect of exposure on individuals.

the degree of exposure they experienced

Focuses on the amount or level of exposure.

having been subjected to

Highlights the act of being subjected to something, implying a potential impact.

those influenced by

Emphasizes the influence or effect of the exposure.

those with a history of

Focuses on past occurrences of exposure.

the extent of their contact with

Focuses on the degree or amount of contact or interaction.

the beneficiaries of

Highlights the positive outcomes or advantages resulting from exposure.

individuals with a background in

Focuses on the experience and knowledge gained through exposure.

FAQs

How can I use "whose exposure" in a sentence?

Use "whose exposure" to show a relationship where something belongs to or is associated with someone or something that has experienced exposure. For example: "The study focused on companies "whose exposure" to international markets had increased significantly."

Is it better to use "whose exposure" or "who was exposed"?

Use "whose exposure" to show a possessive relationship, indicating that the exposure is a characteristic or aspect of the noun it modifies. Use "who was exposed" when you want to describe someone who has undergone the action of being exposed. For example: "the worker "who was exposed" to radiation" vs "the worker "whose exposure" to radiation was monitored closely".

What are some alternatives to using "whose exposure"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "whose exposure" could include "with exposure to", "affected by", or "influenced by". Consider phrases like "the children with "exposure to" lead" or "the communities "affected by" the chemical spill".

How does the formality of the context affect the use of "whose exposure"?

"Whose exposure" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. However, in very informal settings, simpler phrasing might be preferred. In academic or professional writing, "whose exposure" is perfectly acceptable and often the most precise way to express the relationship.