whose costs

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "whose costs" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you are referencing the costs of someone or something specific. For example: "We were shocked to see how high whose costs were for the new laptop."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Big batteries, whose costs are plunging, are leading the way.

The Guardian

Most liberals favor states also supplying common benefits, like roads whose costs would otherwise be prohibitive.

Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics

They generate desperately needed revenue while discouraging behaviors whose costs greatly outweigh their benefits.

The New York Times

Critics contend that gambling represents a regressive tax whose costs outweigh any benefits.

The New York Times

After all, who would support a rule whose costs exceed its benefits?

The New York Times

Doctors whose costs for patients are deemed excessive "can be identified and counseled," Mr. Jones said.

The New York Times

But it cannot compete with coal-fired power plants whose costs have been amortized over decades.

The New York Times

Using fuel for activities whose costs exceed their benefits makes the economic pie smaller.

The New York Times

Barclays' increase was matched by Deutsche Bank, whose costs rose to £12.2bn from £9.4bn.

The Guardian - Business

The increased transit benefit would primarily help suburban commuters, whose costs often exceed the current cap.

The New York Times

This "carry-forward" procedure applies to all central services whose costs were fixed in the approved plan.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing costs, always specify the units (e.g., dollars, euros) and the period (e.g., per year, per unit) to provide context and allow for accurate comparison.

Common error

Avoid attributing costs to the wrong entity. Double-check that the "whose" refers to the correct subject to prevent misunderstandings and inaccurate financial reporting.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "whose costs" functions as a determiner specifying possession or association between a noun phrase (e.g., "batteries", "roads") and the costs related to it. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "whose costs" is a grammatically sound and very common phrase used to clearly attribute expenses or financial burdens. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and prevalence across diverse contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, ensure accurate attribution to avoid misunderstandings. While suitable for neutral register, it might be too informal for highly academic or scientific contexts where more specific language could be preferred. Remember alternatives like "the expenses associated with" or "cost implications of" can offer different nuances. Source quality analysis demonstrates that this phrase is often seen in reputable publications like The New York Times and The Guardian.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the price of

Substitutes "costs" with "price", offering a more direct synonym.

the charges for

Uses "charges" to refer to the amount asked for a service.

the expenses associated with

Replaces the possessive "whose" with a more descriptive phrase focusing on association.

expenses incurred by

Shifts focus to expenses that have already been made.

the expenditure for

Uses "expenditure" as a more formal alternative to "costs".

the outlay for

Replaces "costs" with outlay, emphasizing initial investment.

cost implications of

Focuses on the 'implications' aspect, useful when discussing impacts.

the financial commitment for

Highlights the committed aspect of the costs, usually more related to a long-term plan.

the financial burden of

Highlights the "burden" aspect, emphasizing the financial strain.

what it costs

Changes the structure to a question format, focusing on the amount.

FAQs

How do I use "whose costs" in a sentence?

Use "whose costs" to show the cost that belongs to a specific entity. For example, "The company is reviewing "whose costs" are exceeding the budget."

What phrases are similar to "whose costs"?

Similar phrases include "the expenses associated with", "the price of", or "cost implications of". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "the costs of which" instead of "whose costs"?

"Whose costs" is generally more concise and natural. "The costs of which" is grammatically correct but often sounds more formal or stilted. Use "whose costs" for better flow.

Can "whose costs" refer to both monetary and non-monetary costs?

Yes, "whose costs" can refer to both. While often used for monetary costs, it can also apply to non-monetary costs like environmental impact or time investment depending on context.