whose consequences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "whose consequences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the outcomes or effects that are associated with a particular subject or action. Example: "The decision to implement the new policy came with consequences that affected the entire organization, whose consequences were felt for years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Most services rely on regular accounts [20, 29, 30] consequently being susceptible to a plethora of attacks [31 35] whose consequences are boosted by multi-tenancy and resource sharing.

Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications

Britain's new referendum lock is a big idea, whose consequences could take years to emerge.

The Economist

I think there are things in Beethoven that don't happen again whose consequences are in Schoenberg.

The New York Times

The Arabs would do better without chaos whose consequences cannot be contained.

The Guardian - Opinion

It is little more than a macabre lottery whose consequences, for many, are lethal".

The Guardian

But Dulles's and Japan's strategy also fostered a deliberate forgetfulness whose consequences haunt us today.

The New York Times

You're living with decisions whose consequences you barely understood when you took them.

The Guardian - Opinion

The archive tells thousands of individual stories of loss whose consequences are still being felt in Iraqi families today.

The New York Times

His governing coalition proposed piecemeal reforms in a bill whose consequences for NHS organisation do not look encouraging.

The Economist

An Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities will unleash a regional war whose consequences might be catastrophic.

The New York Times

"It is taking decisions whose consequences are not only squeezing the middle class, but threatening its very existence".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "whose consequences", ensure the connection between the subject and the consequences is clear to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify the actor or event leading to the consequences directly before using the phrase.

Common error

Avoid placing "whose consequences" too far from the noun it modifies. An unclear antecedent can confuse readers about what exactly is causing the consequences being discussed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "whose consequences" functions as a relative clause modifying a noun, indicating a direct relationship between something and its resulting effects or outcomes. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable grammar.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "whose consequences" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed relative clause used to link an action, event, or decision directly to its ensuing effects. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for diverse contexts such as news, scientific literature, and formal communications. While alternatives like "that result in" and "leading to" exist, the specificity and formal tone of "whose consequences" make it a valuable tool for precise and impactful writing. Just ensure the antecedent is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

that result in

Focuses on the direct result or outcome, simplifying the possessive structure.

resulting in

Similar to 'that result in', but can imply a more conclusive outcome.

leading to

Emphasizes the direction or path towards a specific outcome.

with the effect of

Highlights the impact or influence that something has.

that bring about

Focuses on the action of causing or producing a particular result.

that produce

Similar to 'which generate', but can be more direct and immediate.

which generate

Highlights the process of creating or producing certain outcomes.

with ensuing effects

Highlights effects that follow or come afterward.

that trigger

Emphasizes a cause-and-effect relationship, implying a prompt reaction.

that entail

Suggests that certain consequences are a necessary part of something.

FAQs

How can I use "whose consequences" in a sentence?

Use "whose consequences" to connect an action, decision, or event to its resulting outcomes. For example, "The policy change, "whose consequences" are still unfolding, has impacted employee morale."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "whose consequences"?

You can use alternatives such as "that result in", "leading to", or "with the effect of" depending on the context. These alternatives may offer a more direct or simplified way to express the relationship between an action and its outcomes. For example: "The policy change that results in lower employee morale."

Is it correct to say "the consequences of which" instead of "whose consequences"?

Yes, "the consequences of which" is grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably with "whose consequences", though the latter is often more concise and direct. For example: "The decision, the consequences of which are still being felt, was controversial."

What's the difference between "whose consequences" and "that impact"?

"Whose consequences" indicates a direct result or outcome stemming from a specific action or decision. "That impact", on the other hand, suggests a broader influence or effect, which may not be as direct or immediate. You can use alternatives like "that impact" instead.