who would command

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "who would command" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are referring to someone who has the authority or ability to give orders or direct others. Example: "In a crisis, it is essential to have a leader who would command respect and inspire confidence among the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

Who would command it?

The New York Times

Unless injuries strike the coach has at least 15 players who would command starting spots at other clubs.

The Guardian - Sport

In either case, the chancellor who would command the widest respect both in Parliament and nationwide would surely be the Liberals' current economic spokesman, Vince Cable.

The Economist

For example, the fund manager could look to save money by hiring less-talented investment executives who would command lower salaries.

The New York Times

I can't think of another new backbench MP who would command the front and opinion pages of newspapers as Jo did.

The Guardian - Opinion

However, highly attuned to the upward-sloping compensation curve, he backed up the truck in the market's bargain aisle.Boston eschewed elite talents like Josh Hamilton and Zack Greinke, who would command eight-figure mega-contracts.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Kennedy was certainly rattled enough by his early failure to look for advice from the general who'd commanded the Allied Expeditionary Force.

The New Yorker

The lighthouse in Barnegat was one of several built along the Atlantic Coast in the 1850's under the supervision of Gen. George Meade, a Philadelphia native who was chief of the corps at the time and who later would command the Union Army in its victory at the Battle of Gettysburg.

The New York Times

The existing 11th Special Air Service Battalion was renamed the 1st Parachute Battalion and, together with the newly raised 2nd and 3rd Parachute Battalions, formed the first of the new airborne formations, 1st Parachute Brigade, commanded by Brigadier Richard Nelson Gale who would later command the 6th Airborne Division.

Wikipedia

"I figured if I had the confidence of those who I would command, that would bring me probably some of the best benefits in terms of getting to accomplish what I need to accomplish," he said.

Los Angeles Times

It was in El Salvador that Steele first came in to close contact with the man who would eventually command US operations in Iraq: David Petraeus.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "who would command", ensure the context clearly indicates the scope and nature of the command or authority being discussed.

Common error

Avoid using "who would command" when the context requires a different tense, such as "who commands" for present tense or "who commanded" for past tense.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who would command" typically functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun by specifying a person expected to exercise authority or leadership. This usage is supported by Ludwig, showcasing its role in introducing subordinate clauses that define potential leaders or figures of authority in various scenarios.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Science

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "who would command" serves as a relative clause to identify potential leaders or figures of authority, often in hypothetical or future scenarios. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usage across varied contexts, predominantly in news and encyclopedic sources. Common alternatives include "who will lead" and "who is to govern". When using "who would command", clarity is key in conveying the scope and nature of authority being referenced.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

who will lead

Focuses on future leadership, similar to the original query, but uses a more direct verb.

who shall direct

Emphasizes a sense of duty or obligation in directing, slightly more formal.

who is to govern

Highlights the act of governing, implying a broader scope of authority.

who is in charge

More direct and informal, asking about current responsibility.

who will be the leader

Explicitly mentions the 'leader' role, adding clarity but less concise.

who is going to manage

Focuses on the 'management' aspect, suggesting a more hands-on role.

who has control

Emphasizes 'control' over the situation or group, indicating power dynamics.

who is responsible

Highlights the 'responsibility' aspect, focusing on accountability.

who presides over

Suggests a formal setting or meeting where someone 'presides'.

who oversees

Implies a supervisory role, focusing on watching and guiding rather than direct command.

FAQs

How to use "who would command" in a sentence?

Use "who would command" to refer to someone expected to take charge or have authority in a hypothetical or future situation. For example: "The study explored "who would command" the most respect among their peers."

What can I say instead of "who would command"?

You can use alternatives like "who will lead", "who is to govern", or "who is in charge" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "who would command" or "who will command"?

Both "who would command" and "who will command" are grammatically correct, but they imply different things. "Who would command" suggests a hypothetical or conditional situation, while "who will command" refers to a more certain future event.

What's the difference between "who would command" and "who had commanded"?

"Who would command" refers to a hypothetical future leader, while "who had commanded" refers to someone who previously held a position of authority.