Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
who will provide
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"who will provide" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to ask or suggest who might take some kind of action. For example, "Who will provide the refreshments for the party?".
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
And if so, who will provide it?
News & Media
But who will provide the funds?
News & Media
Clearly Katine needs more support, but who will provide it?
News & Media
A special teams standout who will provide depth at linebacker.
News & Media
Finding someone who will provide a legitimate challenge to Mark Sanchez? Deciding Darrelle Revis's fate?
News & Media
Is he an unreconstructed liberal who will provide the left's answer to Ronald Reagan?
News & Media
Who will provide the next subsidy when there is no additional pool of nonparticipants to tap?
News & Media
Azubuike, 26, is an excellent 3-point shooter who will provide depth at shooting guard.
News & Media
He is also someone who will provide the team with goals and assists from midfield.
News & Media
In those moments, he needs a vice president who will provide absolute support.
News & Media
Mingling with the crowds will be 12 RSPCA inspectors, who will provide 24-hour cover.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
In formal writing, consider whether a more specific term than 'provide' might be more appropriate, such as 'supply', 'offer', or 'furnish', depending on the nuance you wish to convey.
Common error
Avoid using "who will provide" when the context implies a more complex action than simply giving or supplying something. For example, if you need to ask about the source of innovation, consider phrases like 'who will innovate' rather than 'who will provide innovation'.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "who will provide" functions as an interrogative clause used to inquire about the agent responsible for supplying or furnishing something. Ludwig's examples show it is used to identify individuals or entities that will offer resources, support, or services.
Frequent in
News & Media
62%
Academia
21%
Science
14%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "who will provide" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to inquire about the source of a provision. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Predominantly found in neutral contexts such as news and media, it serves the purpose of eliciting information and clarifying responsibility. While versatile, ensure the context and scope are well-defined to avoid ambiguity. Consider related phrases to adjust the tone and formality. Ludwig's examples and analysis offer a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively use this phrase.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
who is going to supply
This phrase uses a more direct and common verb, 'supply', to denote the act of providing.
who shall furnish
This alternative uses a more formal and slightly archaic verb to denote providing something.
who will be the provider of
This phrase uses a noun form, 'provider', which adds a slightly more formal and official tone.
who is responsible for providing
This alternative focuses on accountability and obligation rather than just the act of providing.
from whom will it be sourced
This alternative changes the focus to the source of the provision, implying a more logistical consideration.
who is designated to contribute
This version implies a specific assignment or pre-determined role in providing something.
who is equipped to deliver
This alternative emphasizes the ability or readiness to provide something effectively.
who is slated to offer
This alternative means 'who is scheduled to offer', implying a prior arrangement or plan.
which entity will grant
This alternative is more formal and suitable when the provision involves permission or official approval.
where will it be obtained from
This option shifts the focus from the actor to the location or entity from which something will be received.
FAQs
How can I use "who will provide" in a sentence?
Use "who will provide" to inquire about the source or agent that will supply something. For example, "Who will provide the necessary funding for the project?"
What are some alternatives to "who will provide"?
Alternatives include asking "who shall furnish", "who is going to supply", or "who is responsible for providing", depending on the context and desired level of formality.
Is it always necessary to specify what will be provided after using "who will provide"?
While not always grammatically required, specifying what will be provided after "who will provide" enhances clarity. Without it, the question can seem vague. For instance, instead of just saying "who will provide?", it's better to ask "who will provide the equipment?"
What's the difference between asking "who will provide" and "who will ensure"?
The phrase "who will provide" seeks to identify the source or supplier of something tangible or intangible. Asking "who will ensure", on the other hand, focuses on responsibility for guaranteeing a certain outcome or standard.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested