Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

who therefore

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "who therefore" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to introduce a clause that explains a consequence or result related to the subject being discussed. Example: "She was the only candidate with the required experience, who therefore was selected for the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

WHO therefore cannot compare cities based on their levels of outdoor air pollution.

News & Media

The Guardian

It was these two sides who therefore kept the scales in balance.

Who, therefore is to blame for the summit's lack of real progress?

News & Media

The Guardian

Who in the Barclays management was involved and who therefore should pay the price?" said Osborne.

Who, therefore, should voters pay attention to and who should the media cover?

These are empty experiences, on offer to people who are not empty and who therefore suffer inordinately.

The Vow, he wrote, "was solely a confection of the newspaper, who therefore bear the responsibility for it.

News & Media

The Guardian

Consequently, preference is given to scholars who wish to carry out longer visits and who therefore can develop working collaborations.

It breaks down for people who have lithium deficiency, and who (therefore) exhibit abrupt cycles of manic and depressive behavior.

"There are some who therefore think there is no reason to party.

News & Media

The New York Times

It's sponsors, too, who therefore come to the table with predisposed ideas of what's worth more — men over women.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "who therefore", ensure that the connection between the person and the consequence is clear and logical. The phrase works best when the person's actions or qualities directly lead to the stated result.

Common error

Avoid using "who therefore" when the connection between the person and the consequence is weak or indirect. The phrase should indicate a direct causal relationship, not just a correlation.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who therefore" functions as a relative pronoun combined with an adverbial conjunction, linking a clause that identifies a person with a clause that states a consequence or result of something related to that person. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Academia

20%

Science

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "who therefore" serves as a useful connector to establish a causal relationship between a person and a resulting action or state. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely employed, especially in news, academic, and scientific contexts. While alternatives like "and consequently" or "as a result" exist, "who therefore" specifically links a person to the outcome, making it a precise choice when the individual's role is central to the consequence. It is important to avoid using this phrase when the connection is indirect or weak, ensuring a clear and logical link for effective communication.

FAQs

How do I use "who therefore" in a sentence?

Use "who therefore" to connect a person's attribute or action directly to a subsequent outcome or consequence. For example, "He was the only candidate with experience, "who therefore", was hired."

What can I say instead of "who therefore"?

Alternatives include "and consequently", "and as a result", or "which means that", depending on the context. These alternatives provide similar causal links without using "who therefore".

Is "who therefore" formal or informal?

"Who therefore" is generally considered neutral to slightly formal. It's suitable for academic, professional, and news contexts but may sound somewhat stilted in casual conversation.

What's the difference between "who therefore" and "who consequently"?

Both "who therefore" and "who consequently" indicate a result or outcome. "Who consequently" may emphasize the sequence of events slightly more, while "who therefore" emphasizes the logical connection. The choice often comes down to stylistic preference.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: