which would make

USAGE SUMMARY

"which would make" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It can be used to introduce a clause that explains the result or consequence of something. Example: "I am considering a new job opportunity, which would make me financially stable for the first time in years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

Which would make it quite a gift.

The New York Times

Which would make us vintners… (Laughs).

The New York Times

(Which would make you Mademoiselle Wrong).

The New York Times

Which would make you feel better?

Columbia University

Which would make you feel worse?

The Washington Post

Northampton, which would make anybody miserable.

The Guardian - Music

Maybe both, which would make everyone in Cincinnati happy.

The New York Times - Sports

2. Which would make the overall economy more efficient.

The New York Times - Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

Which would make this particular trip harder without him.

Huffington Post

However, the severe family history should be taken into account, which would make drug treatment reasonable.

BMC Family Practice

Which would make it The Hangover meets Cocoon.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "which would make", ensure that the 'which' refers clearly to the preceding clause, avoiding ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "which would make" when the antecedent of 'which' is ambiguous. Ensure the clause 'which' refers to is clear to prevent reader confusion.

Linguistic Context

Which would make functions as a relative clause, specifically a non-restrictive (or non-essential) clause. It adds extra information about the result or consequence of the main clause. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and frequently used in English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

28%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "which would make" is a versatile and grammatically correct phrase used to connect clauses and explain results or consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and its frequent appearance across diverse sources like News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business writing underscores its widespread acceptance. While alternatives such as "that would cause" or "resulting in" exist, "which would make" remains a clear and effective choice for adding detail and context. Remember to use it when you want to present results!

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

that would create

Emphasizes the act of creation or origination as a result.

which leads to

Directly indicates a sequence of events where one leads to another.

that would cause

Highlights a direct causal relationship between the initial action and the resulting outcome.

resulting in

Highlights the final outcome or result of a process or action.

this would generate

Focuses on the production or generation of something as a consequence.

consequently producing

Indicates a direct cause-and-effect relationship where something is produced as a result.

that implies

Suggests the consequence is a logical deduction or implication.

thus forming

Focuses on the formation or creation of something as a direct consequence.

this entails

Emphasizes that something is necessarily involved as a consequence.

that originates

Highlights the origin or starting point of a consequence.

FAQs

How can I use "which would make" in a sentence?

Use "which would make" to connect a clause or idea to its result or consequence. For example, "The new policy simplifies the process, "which would make" it more efficient".

What are some alternatives to "which would make"?

You can use alternatives such as "that would cause", "resulting in", or "this implies" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to start a sentence with "which would make"?

While grammatically possible, starting a sentence directly with "which would make" is less common. It typically functions best when it refers back to a previous clause, creating a dependent clause. Consider rephrasing if starting the sentence feels awkward.

How does "which would make" differ from "that would make"?

"Which" introduces non-restrictive (additional) information, while "that" introduces restrictive (essential) information. "Which would make" adds extra detail about the result, whereas "that would make" is crucial to understanding the initial clause.