Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

which would explain

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"which would explain" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are introducing a new explanation or idea that has been established earlier in the sentence or conversation. For example: "The outcome was unexpected, which would explain why he looked so surprised."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Which would explain the beer.

Which would explain the Saturday daytime repeat.

Which would explain why the official murder investigation went nowhere.

News & Media

The Guardian

Re-absorption plays a much smaller role for F760, which would explain its decrease.

Science & Research

Nature

Which would explain the serious hardware, including long-range missiles, at Hizbullah's disposal.

Each in their own way was looking for one guiding principle which would explain everything.

They wanted to give me a presentation which would explain all the things I'd seen.

Or even that make the user come back feeling happier, which would explain that motivation.

Her Armenian name may denote Armenian training, which would explain that sound.

News & Media

Independent

The issues Pew was asking about were to some extent political, which would explain differing partisan views.

Testosterone, of course, is linked to sexual excitement, which would explain the overheated tone of those Barclays emails.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "which would explain" to smoothly introduce a logical explanation following a statement, ensuring a clear connection between the information and its consequence.

Common error

Avoid placing "which would explain" too far from the element it clarifies, as this can create confusion. Keep the explanatory phrase close to the statement it's meant to elucidate for maximum clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which would explain" functions as a connective phrase, specifically a causal connector. It serves to link a preceding statement with an explanation or a reason. As Ludwig AI shows, it's commonly used to introduce an explanation for something mentioned earlier in the sentence.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

39%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "which would explain" is a frequently used causal connector that introduces a logical explanation or reason for a preceding statement. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability across various contexts. Predominantly found in News & Media and Scientific domains, its usage suggests a neutral register suitable for both formal and informal communication. To enhance writing, ensure the phrase closely follows the information it clarifies and consider alternatives like "that clarifies" or "this sheds light on" for stylistic variation.

FAQs

How can I use "which would explain" in a sentence?

Use "which would explain" to introduce an explanation or a reason that clarifies a previous statement. For instance, "The team's success was unexpected, "which would explain" the manager's surprise".

What are some alternatives to "which would explain"?

Alternatives include phrases like "that clarifies", "that accounts for", or "this sheds light on", depending on the desired nuance.

Is it better to use "which explains" or "which would explain"?

Both "which explains" and ""which would explain"" are grammatically correct. "Which explains" suggests a direct, immediate explanation, while ""which would explain"" implies a more conditional or hypothetical explanation.

What's the difference between "which explains" and "which would explain"?

"Which explains" is used for stating a fact or a direct consequence. "Which would explain" suggests a hypothetical reason or possible explanation, often implying a degree of speculation or conditionality.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: