Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
which were rejected
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "which were rejected" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to items, proposals, or ideas that have been dismissed or not accepted in a particular context. Example: "The committee reviewed several proposals, but ultimately, only a few were approved, while others, which were rejected, did not meet the necessary criteria."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
56 human-written examples
Mr. Gonzalez filed appeals, which were rejected.
News & Media
Manuscripts submitted for publication which were rejected, withdrawn, or accepted, with referee reports.
Academia
Streeting backed proposals to reform the NUS, which were rejected by conference delegates yesterday.
News & Media
Student leaders have said they made counter-offers, all of which were rejected.
News & Media
Rival Carillion made three bids a year ago, all of which were rejected.
News & Media
He simply ignores repeated Israeli initiatives for peace, which were rejected by the Palestinians.
News & Media
He sold them fake antiques & got them theatre tickets At first, he made homosexual advances to Zelig, which were rejected.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
4 human-written examples
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Which was rejected.
News & Media
It is 1334 which was rejected by the Tribunal.
Academia
Kushner's company offered $265 million, which was rejected.
News & Media
Later he submitted a written transfer request which was rejected.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "which were rejected", ensure the preceding noun is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "the proposals which were rejected" rather than just "the ones which were rejected".
Common error
Avoid using 'that' in nonrestrictive clauses. If the information provided by "which were rejected" is not essential to the sentence's meaning, use 'which' and enclose the clause in commas. Using 'that' in such cases is grammatically incorrect.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
"Which were rejected" functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun or pronoun by providing additional information about it. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used, adding descriptive detail.
Frequent in
News & Media
56%
Academia
16%
Science
16%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Formal & Business
3%
Social Media
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "which were rejected" is a grammatically correct and very common relative clause used to provide additional information about something that has been turned down or not accepted. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness. It is most frequently found in news and media, academic, and scientific contexts, indicating a neutral register. When using the phrase, ensure that the preceding noun is clearly defined, and that 'which' is used correctly in nonrestrictive clauses. Alternatives like "that were declined" or "that were dismissed" can be used for a more formal tone.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
that were turned down
Emphasizes the act of refusing or declining something offered.
that were declined
Focuses on a polite or formal refusal of an offer or proposal.
that were dismissed
Highlights the act of disregarding or rejecting something as unworthy of consideration.
that were refused
Indicates a direct and often firm rejection.
that were vetoed
Suggests a rejection by someone with authority or power to do so.
that were repudiated
Implies a formal and public rejection or disavowal.
that were nullified
Indicates a rejection that renders something invalid or without legal force.
that were overruled
Highlights a rejection by a higher authority or a superior decision.
that met with disapproval
Focuses on the lack of approval or acceptance that led to the rejection.
that faced rejection
Emphasizes the experience of being rejected, rather than the act itself.
FAQs
How can I use "which were rejected" in a sentence?
You can use "which were rejected" to add extra information about something previously mentioned in your sentence. For example, "The company submitted several proposals, "which were rejected" due to budget constraints."
What is a more formal alternative to "which were rejected"?
For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "that were declined" or "that were dismissed". These alternatives maintain a professional tone while conveying the same meaning as "which were rejected".
What is the difference between "which were rejected" and "that were rejected"?
"Which were rejected" introduces a nonrestrictive clause, providing additional but non-essential information. "That were rejected" would introduce a restrictive clause, essential to identifying what you're referring to. The choice depends on whether the clause is necessary for understanding the sentence's core meaning.
Can I start a sentence with "which were rejected"?
No, you cannot start a sentence with "which were rejected". This phrase is a relative clause and requires a main clause to provide complete meaning. It must refer back to a noun or idea previously introduced in the sentence.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested