Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

which was weird

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "which was weird" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that was strange or unusual in a previous context or situation. Example: "The way he reacted to the news was unexpected, which was weird considering how calm he usually is."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

Which was weird.

News & Media

Independent

Which was weird for me.

It's exactly the same – and I've gone back in since, which was weird.

First Warner only got one off a juicy full toss, which was weird enough.

And at times, the relationship became frighteningly similar to that of me and my mother, which was weird.

News & Media

The New York Times

Chris Christie also declined to comment, which was weird, because we hadn't reached out to him in the first place.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

Which is weird.

News & Media

The New York Times

Ten points to Malta, which is weird.

Which is weird, because that was also my plan.

News & Media

The New Yorker

They're both dressed as Katy Perry, which is weird.

Which is weird, because typing is fundamentally old-fashioned.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "which was weird" to express a mild sense of surprise or bewilderment at an unexpected or unusual event. It's suitable for informal and conversational contexts.

Common error

While acceptable in informal contexts, overuse of "which was weird" can make your writing sound unprofessional. Opt for more precise and sophisticated language, such as "which was unexpected" or "which was atypical" in formal documents.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which was weird" functions as a nonrestrictive relative clause, providing additional commentary on a preceding statement. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

82%

Wiki

9%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Science

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "which was weird" is a grammatically correct and very common way to express surprise or confusion, typically found in neutral to informal contexts such as News & Media. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it functions as a nonrestrictive relative clause. While acceptable for casual communication, it's advisable to use more formal alternatives like "which was unusual" or "which was strange" in professional or academic writing. Remember to use it to express your opinion, but cautiously adapt it in more formal situations.

FAQs

How can I use "which was weird" in a sentence?

You can use "which was weird" to describe something that you found strange or unusual in a previous context. For example, "He didn't say hello, "which was weird", because he always greets me."

What can I say instead of "which was weird"?

You can use alternatives like "which was strange", "which was odd", or "which was unusual" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "which was weird"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase "which" introduces a relative clause that modifies the preceding clause, and "was weird" is a simple past tense statement. The sentence is constructed properly.

What is the difference between "which was weird" and "that was weird"?

While both phrases are used to express something unusual, "which was weird" tends to add additional nonessential information, and "that was weird" to add defining information. "That was weird" is more direct. Context and intent dictate the best choice.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: