Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

which was later

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "which was later" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to something that occurred or was established after a previously mentioned event or point in time. Example: "The discovery was significant, which was later acknowledged by the scientific community."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

USA Today also ran the story, which was later discounted.

"We had a disagreement which was later resolved.

News & Media

Independent

Then came Srebrenica, which was later defined as genocide.

"You're kidding me?" read the tweet, which was later deleted.

News & Media

The Guardian

He introduced the S matrix, which was later taken up by Heisenberg.

One day, she returned to the group with a bone which was later identified as human.

Aniq was on the early team at Behance which was later acquired by Adobe (NASDAQ ADBE).

During that interrogation, Montejo wrote a confession letter, which was later admitted as evidence.

The resulting CPC was converted to 7-ACA, which was later purified by crystallization.

We describe embolisation followed by removal of the buccal cortical plate, which was later replaced.

Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons Watchmenn, which was later made into a film.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "which was later", ensure the initial clause provides sufficient context for the subsequent event to be meaningful. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid excessive use of passive voice when using "which was later". Over-reliance on the passive can make your writing sound weak and indirect. Try to rephrase sentences to use active voice where appropriate for a more engaging style.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which was later" functions as a relative clause, adding supplementary information to a preceding noun or clause. It introduces a detail about something that occurred or became known at a subsequent time. As Ludwig AI says, this is grammatically correct and used in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Academia

28%

Science

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "which was later" is a grammatically sound relative clause used to provide additional information about a previously mentioned subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a valid and common expression. It is most frequently found in news, academic, and scientific contexts, demonstrating its versatility across different registers. When using the phrase, ensure clarity and avoid overuse of passive voice. Alternatives like "that was subsequently" or "which subsequently became" can add nuance to your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "which was later" in a sentence?

Use "which was later" to connect a clause that provides additional information about something previously mentioned, specifying a subsequent event or change. For example, "The initial proposal was rejected, "which was later" revised and approved".

What are some alternatives to "which was later"?

Alternatives include "that was subsequently", "which subsequently became", or "that eventually turned into". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "which was later" or "that was later"?

Both "which was later" and "that was later" can be grammatically correct, but "which" is generally used for non-restrictive clauses (providing extra information), while "that" is used for restrictive clauses (essential to the meaning of the sentence). Choose the appropriate pronoun based on whether the clause is essential or additional.

How does "which was later" differ from "previously"?

"Which was later" indicates a sequence of events, emphasizing what happened after something else. "Previously" simply refers to something that happened at an earlier time, without necessarily implying a direct connection or sequence. For example, "The project faced challenges, "which was later" overcome" versus "The project faced challenges previously".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: