which was good

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of a sentence "which was good" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was positive or favorable. For example, "He got a high grade on his test, which was good."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

All of which was good.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Which was good news," DiDia continued.

The New York Times - Magazine

She [Sarah] blasted that, which was good.

The Guardian - Film

I putted well the last two days, which was good".

The New York Times - Sports

"I was throwing a lot of strikes, which was good.

The New York Times - Sports

And it wasn't the money, which was good.

The New York Times

Fortunately, people didn't seem upset with me, which was good.

The New York Times

He didn't include that in the show, which was good.

The New York Times - Arts

"We had a test match today which was good.

The New York Times - Sports

She didn't have it, which was good news, he said.

The New York Times - Magazine

"They were demanding, too," Dr. Bargonetti said, "which was good".

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "which was good" to succinctly express a positive outcome or approval of a preceding event or action. It works best when the context is already clear and the positive aspect is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid overusing "which was good" in formal writing. While grammatically correct, it can sound simplistic. Consider replacing it with more sophisticated alternatives like "which proved beneficial" or "which yielded positive results" for a more polished tone.

Linguistic Context

"Which was good" functions as a nonrestrictive relative clause, adding supplementary information or an evaluation of the preceding statement. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Academia

19%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "which was good" is a grammatically sound and very common phrase used to express a positive evaluation or approval. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and usability across diverse contexts. While versatile, its simplicity makes it more suitable for neutral or informal settings; more sophisticated alternatives may be preferable in formal writing. To enhance clarity and impact, consider the specific context and choose more descriptive expressions when appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was a good thing

A more general expression of approval or positive assessment.

which was helpful

Focuses on the helpfulness of something.

that was positive

Replaces "which was good" with a more direct adjective describing the situation.

that turned out well

Focuses on the favorable result or outcome of an event or situation.

it worked out favorably

Indicates a positive resolution or outcome.

it was beneficial

Highlights the advantageous nature of the situation or action.

that was satisfactory

Expresses that something met expectations or requirements.

that proved useful

Emphasizes the practicality and helpfulness of something.

that was fortunate

Highlights the luck or good fortune associated with the event.

this was an advantage

Highlights a competitive edge or opportunity.

FAQs

How can I use "which was good" in a sentence?

Use "which was good" to add a comment or evaluation about a previous clause or statement, indicating a positive aspect or result. For instance, "The rain stopped, "which was good", because we could finally start the picnic."

What are some alternatives to "which was good"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "which was good" include "that was positive", "that was beneficial", or "that turned out well".

Is there a difference between "which was good" and "that was good"?

While both are generally acceptable, "which was good" typically introduces a non-restrictive clause (additional information), whereas "that was good" can introduce a restrictive clause (essential information). However, in informal usage, they are often used interchangeably.

When is it best to avoid using "which was good"?

It's often better to avoid "which was good" in very formal or academic writing where a more sophisticated or precise expression of positivity may be preferred. Consider using alternatives that better reflect the specific nuance you want to convey.