which was after

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "which was after" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to something that occurred subsequent to a previously mentioned event or time frame. Example: "The meeting took place on Monday, which was after the deadline for submissions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Which was, after all, the whole point.

The Guardian - Sport

Pleased with your purchase – which was, after all, far cheaper than you expected – or uneasy about it?

Harvard University

We instantly felt like foreigners in a foreign land, which was after all, our goal.

The New York Times - Travel

Judt often missed Europe, which was after all his subject, but he flourished mightily in America.

The Guardian - Books

They have not reconnected since the initial meeting, which was after the election and prior to inauguration".

The New Yorker

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON: And why did you not want to be a member of the SS, which was after all one of the important Party formations?

Yale University

And think about what happens if the new Greek government — which was, after all, elected on a promise to end austerity — refuses to give in?

The New York Times

He pleaded guilty in 2003, not 2002, which was after he had been elected mayor, not when he was running for re-election.

The New York Times

"I hope people won't be too disappointed that I've opted for white tie and tails, which was, after all, the standard western concert dress for so many years".

The Guardian - Music

He said he planned to stay on at Patria, which was after all only two blocks from Chicama and Pipa, and that he had "this Latino barbecue concept".

The New York Times

"She was doing one of the things she loved most - sunbathing and listening to music which was, after all, her first love," he said.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "which was after" to clearly indicate a chronological sequence of events, particularly when the order is important for understanding the context. For example, "The deadline was extended, which was after many had already submitted their work."

Common error

Avoid using incorrect tenses when employing "which was after". Ensure the verb tenses in both clauses are consistent and accurately reflect the timing of the events. For example, avoid mixing past and present tenses inappropriately: "The meeting is scheduled, which was after the report was due." Instead, maintain consistency: "The meeting was scheduled, which was after the report was due."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which was after" functions as a relative clause introducing additional information about the timing of a previous event. As Ludwig AI points out, it's grammatically sound. The clause specifies that an event happened subsequently to the one mentioned before.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

28%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "which was after" is a versatile and grammatically sound relative clause used to establish a chronological sequence between two events. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is widely accepted in written English and commonly found in news articles, scientific publications, and academic texts. While it maintains a generally neutral tone, its register can be adjusted based on context. When using "which was after", ensure consistency in verb tenses and clarity in the sequence of events. Alternatives such as "subsequent to which" or "following which" can be used for stylistic variation. Ludwig's analysis of source data highlights the practical applications and provides guidance for effective usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

which followed

A more concise way of expressing the same relationship, focusing on the immediate sequence.

that occurred after

This phrase replaces "was" with "occurred", making it slightly more descriptive.

following which

This option is similar in meaning but provides a slightly simpler and more direct way to express the sequence of events.

that took place after

This alternative is similar to 'that occurred after' but uses 'took place' to add emphasis to the event.

later than which

This alternative emphasizes the point in time when something occurred in relation to a prior event.

subsequent to which

This alternative offers a more formal tone, emphasizing the chronological sequence.

succeeding that

This phrase is formal and emphasizes the consecutive nature of the events.

in the wake of which

This alternative suggests the following event happened as a result of the previous one, often implying a significant impact.

then

This is a very brief substitute, useful in informal contexts where brevity is preferred.

resulting from

This alternative introduces a cause-and-effect relationship, indicating that the subsequent event was a result of the prior one.

FAQs

How can I use "which was after" in a sentence?

Use "which was after" to show that something happened following a specific event or time. For example: "The presentation took place on Tuesday, "which was after" the initial deadline".

What are some alternatives to "which was after"?

Alternatives include "subsequent to which", "following which", or "that occurred after". The best choice depends on the desired tone and level of formality.

Is it correct to say "that was after" instead of "which was after"?

While "that was after" might be acceptable in informal contexts, "which was after" is generally preferred in more formal writing because it is considered grammatically correct when introducing a nonrestrictive clause. Consider your audience and the overall tone of your writing.

What's the difference between "which was after" and "and then"?

"Which was after" is used to connect two clauses, with the second providing additional information about the timing of the first. "And then" simply indicates a sequence of events without necessarily providing extra context. "The rain stopped, and then the sun came out" versus "The rain stopped, "which was after" several hours of heavy downpour".