which lasted for

USAGE SUMMARY

'which lasted for' is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the duration of something, usually an event or an activity. For example: "The party, which lasted for five hours, was a great success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Her performance last weekend, which lasted for about 20 minutes, was her most elaborate to date.

Independent

Tells about the trial which lasted for six months.

The New Yorker

He viewed this pre-interview, which lasted for about two hours, as the first of several.

University of California, Berkeley

Each performance ended with a standing ovation, which lasted for minutes.

Stanford University

Five groups of female rats were used in this study, which lasted for 12 weeks.

Toxicology

At the end of trainings, which lasted for 2 weeks, both groups filled the questionnaires.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

In 1956 she suffered her first bout of depression, which lasted for more than a year.

The Guardian - Arts

He himself developed a doctrine of mystical love, the influence of which lasted for centuries.

Britannica

But during Ramadan, which lasted for a month, there was still shelling every night.

The Guardian

The ever-pragmatic Bordelais welcomed English rule, which lasted for 300 years.

The New York Times - Travel

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

However, Blogger experienced a massive outage in May 2011, which lasted for nearly 24 hours.

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "which lasted for" in formal writing, ensure it flows smoothly within the sentence structure. Sometimes, rephrasing for conciseness can improve readability.

Common error

Avoid using "that lasted for" when "which lasted for" is more appropriate. "Which" introduces non-restrictive clauses, providing additional information that isn't essential to the sentence's core meaning. "That" introduces restrictive clauses, essential for defining the noun. If the duration information is not crucial, use "which".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which lasted for" functions as a relative clause, specifically a non-restrictive (or non-essential) clause. This adds extra information about a noun without being crucial to its identification, as Ludwig AI confirms.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "which lasted for" is a versatile phrase functioning as a non-restrictive relative clause to specify the duration of an event or state. It’s grammatically correct, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, and frequently appears in varied contexts, including news, science, and academia. While generally neutral in tone, more concise alternatives might sometimes be preferred for stylistic reasons. Key considerations include ensuring correct usage of "which" versus "that" and choosing whether the duration information is essential or additional. This phrase is suitable for clear and unambiguous communication regarding temporal aspects. Ludwig examples showcase its broad applicability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

that endured for

Replaces "lasted" with "endured", emphasizing persistence through difficulty.

that continued for

Uses "continued" instead of "lasted", focusing on the uninterrupted nature of the duration.

that extended for

Substitutes "lasted" with "extended", suggesting a stretching out over time.

that persisted for

Replaces "lasted" with "persisted", highlighting a duration that overcame obstacles.

that spanned

Uses "spanned" to indicate the duration covered, implying a beginning and end point.

the duration of which was

A more formal and verbose way of expressing the same idea, emphasizing the length of time.

with a duration of

Focuses on the duration as a property or characteristic.

lasting

A more concise alternative, omitting "which" and "for".

that occupied

Uses "occupied" to describe that the duration was filled with that activity.

of

A simplified version. It may need additional context to make sense.

FAQs

How can I use "which lasted for" in a sentence?

You can use "which lasted for" to describe the duration of an event or condition, for example: "The meeting, "which lasted for" two hours, covered several key topics".

What are some alternatives to "which lasted for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "that endured for", "that continued for", or simply "lasting", depending on the context and desired level of formality. For example, instead of "The storm, "which lasted for" a week, caused significant damage", you could say "The storm, "that endured for" a week, caused significant damage".

Is it better to use "which lasted for" or a more concise phrase?

The best choice depends on the context. "Which lasted for" provides clarity, but in some cases, a shorter phrase like "lasting" might be more appropriate if the duration is already implied. If you need to emphasize duration explicitly, retain the longer phrase.

What's the difference between "which lasted for" and "that lasted for"?

"Which lasted for" introduces a non-restrictive clause, adding extra information. "That lasted for" would introduce a restrictive clause essential to the sentence's meaning. For instance, "The presentation, "which lasted for" an hour, was informative" suggests the presentation was already identified. If you use "that", you are narrowing down the definition of the item: "The presentation "that lasted for" over an hour was the only good one.".