Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

which could be

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"which could be" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when comparing two possibilities that are both currently feasible. For example, "There are two paths I could take, one of which could be to major in physics."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Which could be her unofficial motto.

News & Media

Independent

Which could be New York's next fad.

Which could be all for the better.

News & Media

The New Yorker

All of which could be perfectly interesting.

News & Media

The New York Times

Which could be a good thing.

News & Media

The New York Times

Which could be a definition of theatricality.

News & Media

The Guardian

Which could be good news for Italy.

Which could be anything up to $10bn, I guess.

News & Media

The Guardian

Which could be described as action from the bottom.

Doing paperwork, most of which could be done by anyone.

Which could be equally dangerous, in the circumstances.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "which could be" to introduce a possible explanation, outcome, or characteristic. Ensure the context clearly indicates the element to which "which" refers.

Common error

Avoid using "which could be" when expressing a definitive fact or certainty. This phrase is best suited for speculative or hypothetical scenarios, not established truths.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which could be" functions as a relative clause introducing a potential characteristic, outcome, or explanation related to the preceding noun or clause. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable status, indicating it follows standard grammatical conventions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "which could be" serves as a versatile tool for expressing possibilities and speculative scenarios, as validated by Ludwig AI. Grammatically sound, it commonly introduces nonrestrictive clauses, adding extra information without being essential to the sentence's core meaning. Its frequency is quite high, especially in contexts such as news and media, scientific writing, and encyclopedic content, reflecting its usefulness in qualified statements. When a more declarative tone is required, alternatives such as "that might be" or "that may be" offer subtle yet effective nuances.

FAQs

How can I use "which could be" in a sentence?

Use "which could be" to introduce a possibility or potential explanation related to something previously mentioned. For example: "The delay might be due to weather, "which could be" snow or heavy rain".

What's the difference between "which could be" and "which is"?

"Which is" states a fact or current condition, while "which could be" suggests a possibility or potential state. Use "which is" for definitive statements and "which could be" for hypothetical or speculative situations.

What can I say instead of "which could be"?

You can use alternatives like "that might be", "that may be", or "that can be" depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to use a comma before "which could be"?

Yes, in most cases, a comma is needed before "which could be" when it introduces a nonrestrictive clause. This means the clause provides additional, but not essential, information about the noun it modifies. If the clause is essential to the meaning of the sentence, the comma should be omitted.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: