Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

which are not

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'which are not' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in order to give additional information about something that you are referring to. For example: "The shop sells many books on philosophy, which are not part of the store's regular inventory."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

which are not AR.

Science

Automatica

Which are not?

News & Media

The New York Times

*-* parameters which are not limited.

Which are not great for developing relationships.

No doubt other volumes existed which are not extant.

(ii Payments made under programs which are not means-tested.

709, which are not classified to the Code.

Over-measurement represents anchoring to evaluations which are not measures.

The solution steps, which are not new, are summarized.

Some of which are likable, some of which are not".

News & Media

The New York Times

Enhancing illumination from pillar candles, which are not always lighted.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "which are not", ensure the "which" clause refers clearly to the noun it modifies to avoid ambiguity. For clarity, place the clause as close as possible to the noun it describes.

Common error

A common mistake is using "which" instead of "that" for restrictive clauses. Use "that" when the clause is essential to the sentence's meaning. "Which" should be used for non-essential clauses, set off by commas. For example: 'The books that are not on the shelf are missing' (essential) vs. 'The books, which are not on the shelf, are missing' (non-essential).

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which are not" functions as a relative clause, providing additional, non-essential information about a noun. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage. These clauses add detail without changing the core meaning of the sentence.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "which are not" is a versatile phrase used to introduce non-essential clauses, adding descriptive detail to sentences. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and frequent use across various contexts. While grammatically sound, it's crucial to use "which" correctly for non-restrictive clauses, differentiating it from "that" for essential information. Mastering this distinction enhances clarity and precision in writing. Consider alternatives like "that aren't" for informality, or rephrasing for conciseness.

FAQs

How do I use "which are not" in a sentence?

Use "which are not" to add non-essential information about something you've already mentioned. For example: "The apples, "which are not" ripe, were discarded."

What's the difference between "that are not" and "which are not"?

"That are not" introduces essential information defining what you're referring to. "Which are not" adds extra, non-essential details. For example: "The cars that are not working will be towed" (essential) versus "The cars, "which are not" working, will be towed" (extra information).

What can I say instead of "which are not"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "that aren't", "that do not", or "which aren't" to express the same meaning.

Is it always necessary to include "which are not" in a sentence?

No, "which are not" can often be omitted or rephrased for conciseness. Consider if the information is crucial to the sentence's core meaning. If not, it might be better to remove the clause altogether or rephrase using a simpler structure.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: