what resulted

USAGE SUMMARY

"what resulted" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used as a question to inquire about the outcome or consequence of a certain action or event. Example: The company implemented several cost-cutting measures. However, what resulted was a decrease in productivity and employee morale.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Arts

Books

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

"What resulted was panic.

The New York Times

What resulted was a colorful, complex work.

The New York Times - Arts

What resulted was a strange balance.

The New York Times - Sports

What resulted was an ecologically and socially sustainable system.

The New York Times - Science

What resulted were technical marvels and boring, soulless movies.

The New Yorker

What resulted, however, were low-scoring, tedious games.

The New York Times - Sports

What resulted was a race to the bottom.

The New York Times

It was not clear what resulted from those meetings.

The New York Times

What resulted, "Awopbopaloobop Alopbamboom," is a monument to speed writing.

The New York Times - Magazine

What resulted was a mixed bag for the publisher: praise and tough questions.

The New York Times - Books

What resulted was an uneasy American mix of "pageantry and plainness".

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "what resulted", ensure the context clearly establishes the preceding action or situation that led to the outcome. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "what resulted" when the connection between the action and the outcome is weak or unclear. Instead, consider using phrases that emphasize correlation or association rather than direct causation.

Linguistic Context

"What resulted" serves as an introductory phrase to present the outcome or consequence of a prior action or event. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and can be used in written English. It functions to transition from a cause to its effect, clarifying the relationship between the two.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Arts

15%

Books

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "what resulted" is a versatile phrase used to introduce the consequences or outcomes of specific actions or events. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and suitability for written English. Its neutral formality makes it appropriate for a wide range of contexts, particularly in news, media and books, where it serves to provide clarity and inform readers about cause-and-effect relationships. While alternatives like "the outcome was" or "the consequence was" exist, "what resulted" maintains its usefulness due to its direct and clear implication of causation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the consequence was

Emphasizes the direct outcome or effect of something.

the outcome was

Focuses on the end result of a process or event.

the effect was

Highlights the impact or influence caused by something.

the upshot was

Suggests a final and summarizing result.

the end result was

Stresses the finality and completion of the outcome.

as a consequence

Expresses that something happened as a direct result of something else.

subsequently

Indicates that something followed after a previous event.

therefore

Indicates a logical conclusion or inference.

the product was

Emphasizes that something tangible or intangible was produced

it led to

Focuses on the path or process that resulted in the final outcome.

FAQs

How can I use "what resulted" in a sentence?

Use "what resulted" to introduce the outcome or consequence of a previous action or event. For example, "The experiment was conducted, and "what resulted" was a significant increase in efficiency."

What are some alternatives to "what resulted"?

You can use phrases like "the outcome was", "the consequence was", or "the effect was" as alternatives to "what resulted", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "what resulted" or "what was the result"?

Both "what resulted" and "what was the result" are grammatically correct, but "what resulted" often implies a more direct and causal relationship. The choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.

Can "what resulted" be used in formal writing?

Yes, "what resulted" is appropriate for formal writing. It is commonly used in academic, business, and journalistic contexts to describe outcomes and consequences objectively.