Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were treated with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were treated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing how someone or something was handled in a particular situation. For example, "The patients were treated with care and respect by the medical team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Customers were treated with respect.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Toothaches were treated with sage and nettles.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Small shareholders were treated with contempt.

News & Media

The Economist

Nineteen were treated with antiepilepsy drugs.

Five mice were treated with HDM.

Science & Research

Nature

Control cells were treated with 0.1% DMSO.

Science & Research

Nature

The cells were treated with different drugs.

Science & Research

Nature

**Patients were treated with escitalopram or nortriptyline.

Science & Research

Nature

These were treated with UGTI.

59 were treated with morphine, and 58 were treated with morphine and clonidine.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Control sections were treated with preimmune serum.

Science

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were treated with", ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what received the treatment, and the object specifies the method or substance used. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "were treated with" in ways that obscure who performed the treatment. While passive voice is acceptable, ensure the context provides clarity, or consider rephrasing to active voice to explicitly state the agent of action.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were treated with" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received a specific form of care, handling, or exposure. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating its widespread use in describing medical treatments, experimental conditions, and even interpersonal interactions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

Academia

33%

News & Media

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were treated with" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive construction, primarily utilized to articulate the specific approach, substance, or method implemented in handling or caring for a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate for describing treatments, experiments, or interactions across diverse domains. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal tone. While its usage is generally straightforward, writers should ensure clarity by explicitly stating the subject and treatment, and consider active voice when emphasizing the actor. It is a versatile phrase for reporting procedures and methods concisely and accurately.

FAQs

How can I use "were treated with" in a sentence?

Use "were treated with" to describe the specific method, substance, or approach used to handle a situation or provide care, as in "Patients "were treated with" antibiotics".

What are some alternatives to "were treated with"?

Consider using alternatives like "were given", "were administered", or "received treatment involving" to express similar meanings with slight differences in emphasis.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were treated with"?

While "were treated with" is in the passive voice, it's grammatically correct. Choose active voice (e.g., "doctors treated patients with") if you want to emphasize the actor; otherwise, passive voice is suitable when the action is the focus.

What's the difference between "were treated with" and "were exposed to"?

"Were treated with" implies an intentional action to provide care or manage a situation, while "were exposed to" suggests an unintentional or experimental subjection to something.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: