Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were to change

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "were to change" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a hypothetical situation. For example: "If the weather were to change, we could plan a picnic for the weekend."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In 1598 things were to change.

If that were to change, we would certainly take notice.

News & Media

The New Yorker

If I were to change anything, Francisco said, he'd know.

News & Media

The New Yorker

If Michael were to change anything, he says, he would upgrade the glass.

The student could always withdraw and reapply if their circumstances were to change".

News & Media

The Guardian

Q: If you were to change it, would he seek cross-party support?

News & Media

The Guardian

Two things, however, happened in 1960 that were to change Britain for ever.

News & Media

The Guardian

It would undermine people's trust in our results and company if we were to change course".

If those underlying assumptions were to change, would all that follows from them change as well?

"If that situation were to change, the commission would comment on any proposed amendments," it said.

News & Media

The Guardian

If libraries were to change, this is what I'd really miss.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were to change" to introduce hypothetical scenarios or conditions, creating a sense of possibility or uncertainty. For example, "If circumstances were to change, we would need to reassess our strategy."

Common error

Avoid using "was to change" when referring to hypothetical or future scenarios involving plural subjects. The correct form is "were to change". For example, use "If the rules were to change" instead of "If the rules was to change".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were to change" primarily functions as part of a conditional clause, introducing a hypothetical scenario or a possible future event. As Ludwig AI points out, it sets the stage for a potential consequence or action, as demonstrated in the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were to change" is a versatile phrase used to introduce hypothetical scenarios and express potential future events. As Ludwig AI correctly indicates, this phrase functions as part of a conditional clause, allowing speakers and writers to explore possibilities and their consequences. It maintains a neutral register, making it suitable for diverse contexts, from news reporting to formal discussions. The phrase is very common, particularly in News & Media and Science contexts. Remember to use "were" with plural subjects, and avoid confusing it with the past tense "changed". By understanding these nuances, you can effectively use "were to change" to enhance the clarity and precision of your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "were to change" in a sentence?

Use "were to change" to describe a hypothetical situation or a condition that might occur. For example, "If the circumstances "were to change", we would have to adjust our plans."

What are some alternatives to "were to change"?

Alternatives include "were subject to change", "were likely to change", or "were going to change", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was to change" instead of "were to change"?

"Was to change" is grammatically incorrect when used with plural subjects. The correct form is ""were to change"" for plural subjects and hypothetical situations. "Was to change" is used with a singular subject.

What is the difference between "were to change" and "changed"?

"Were to change" describes a hypothetical or potential future event, while "changed" refers to an event that has already occurred. For example, "If the regulations "were to change", we would adapt," versus "The regulations "changed" last year."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: