Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were studied for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The part of the sentence "were studied for" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it when referring to research or study done on a specific topic or object. For example, "The effects of climate change on coral reefs were studied for several years."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Seventeen mice were studied for each group.
Science & Research
Another involved 48 people, who were studied for a month.
News & Media
Nasal secretions were studied for cytokine and H2 O2 content.
Academia
Nine patients were studied for manual preference and limb development.
Academia
The original HERS study included 2,763 women who were studied for 4.1 years.
News & Media
Only about 40 years ago, quantum phenomena were studied for their own curiosities.
Science & Research
The dyes were studied for their photophysical and electrochemical properties.
Science
Two tile drainage systems were studied for nitrate loss.
These five different solutions were studied for keratoconus treatment alternatively.
Science
All data were collected from 4 independent experiments on the seventh day after the cells were studied for 24 h.
Science & Research
But, he said, the mice were studied for only a couple of months.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were studied for", ensure the sentence clearly states what characteristics, effects, or properties "were studied for". This provides context and clarity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "were studied for" without specifying the purpose. For example, instead of saying "The samples were studied for," specify "The samples were studied for their chemical composition".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were studied for" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject (e.g., samples, patients, systems) was the recipient of investigation or analysis. This is confirmed by Ludwig AI and examples where the subject is acted upon to determine certain characteristics or outcomes.
Frequent in
Science
78%
Academia
12%
News & Media
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were studied for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction, predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's employed to specify the purpose of an investigation, highlighting the characteristics or outcomes being examined. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly stating what the subjects "were studied for". Though prevalent in formal writing, the phrase is also found in news and media, showing its versatility. Alternatives such as "were analyzed to determine" and "were investigated regarding" offer similar meanings with slight nuances. Ultimately, mastering the use of "were studied for" involves understanding its grammatical function, communicative purpose, and appropriate register.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were analyzed to determine
Focuses on the analytical aspect of the study, highlighting the determination of specific factors or properties.
were investigated regarding
Implies a more formal and thorough examination of the subjects in relation to a particular aspect.
were examined to assess
Emphasizes the evaluation or measurement aspect of the study, focusing on assessing specific qualities or outcomes.
were researched to understand
Highlights the goal of gaining a deeper understanding of the subjects and their characteristics.
were assessed in terms of
Focuses on evaluating the subjects based on specific criteria or factors.
were explored concerning
Suggests a more exploratory and less structured investigation of the subjects and their characteristics.
were subjected to analysis for
Emphasizes the process of subjecting the subjects to analytical procedures.
underwent scrutiny for
Highlights a detailed and critical examination of the subjects.
were tested with respect to
Focuses on testing the subjects to determine their response to specific conditions or variables.
were evaluated regarding
Focuses on a systematic appraisal to assess the qualities or characteristics of the subject.
FAQs
How do I use "were studied for" in a sentence?
Use "were studied for" to indicate the purpose of a scientific investigation or analysis. For example, "The effects of the new drug "were studied for" any potential side effects".
What are some alternatives to using "were studied for"?
Alternatives include "were analyzed to determine", "were investigated regarding", or "were examined to assess", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were studied for"?
While "were studied for" is in the passive voice, it's often preferred in scientific writing to maintain objectivity. However, using active voice (e.g., "Researchers studied the effects of...") can make the writing more direct and engaging, depending on your audience.
What is the difference between "were studied for" and "were researched for"?
"Were studied for" is generally used for a more focused and specific investigation, while "were researched for" implies a broader and more comprehensive inquiry. The choice depends on the scope and depth of the investigation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested