Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were scrutinized
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were scrutinized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that has been examined or analyzed closely, often in a critical manner. Example: "The financial records were scrutinized by the auditors to ensure accuracy and compliance with regulations."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
were examined
were analyzed
have been revising
have been assessment
have been revision
have been examined
have been explored
were checked
have been revised
have been review
were investigated
were evaluated
have been revisited
were considered
have been inspected
have been reviewed
have been verified
were assessed
were inspected
have been to examine
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Photo albums were scrutinized.
News & Media
The smallest points were scrutinized.
News & Media
Eyes were scrutinized for crow's-feet.
News & Media
Her friends were scrutinized, her letters opened.
News & Media
The goals of both organizations (were) scrutinized, evaluated, and approved.
Academia
The Iraqi military's actions were scrutinized more closely, however.
News & Media
Both the man and his writings were scrutinized.
News & Media
Any joint appearances by the brothers were scrutinized.
News & Media
Yet its practices were scrutinized by lawmakers and law enforcement.
News & Media
"They were scrutinized by the bureau chief of homicide.
News & Media
Reports concerning the period of his stay in England were scrutinized.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were scrutinized", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what was doing the scrutinizing and what criteria were used in the evaluation.
Common error
Avoid overusing the passive voice with "were scrutinized" to the point where the actor performing the scrutiny is unclear or omitted. In many cases, specifying who did the scrutinizing adds clarity and impact to your writing. For example, instead of "The data were scrutinized", consider "The researchers scrutinized the data."
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were scrutinized" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received a careful and critical examination. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's usable in written English. Examples in Ludwig show it applied to various subjects like "photo albums", "military actions", and "anesthetic records", demonstrating broad applicability.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
35%
Academia
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were scrutinized" signifies a thorough and critical examination, often implying a judgmental context. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in English. It's frequently found in scientific, news, and academic writing, indicating a formal tone. For alternative expressions, consider phrases like "were examined closely" or "were carefully inspected", depending on the specific shade of meaning you wish to convey. When writing, ensure that the actor doing the scrutinizing is clear, and avoid overuse of the passive voice to maintain clarity and impact.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were examined closely
Focuses more on the act of examination without necessarily implying a critical assessment.
were carefully inspected
Emphasizes the thoroughness of the inspection process.
were closely analyzed
Highlights the detailed analysis and interpretation of data or information.
were intensely reviewed
Emphasizes the intensity and depth of the review process.
were thoroughly investigated
Suggests a more formal and systematic inquiry, often with the goal of uncovering facts.
were meticulously assessed
Underscores the precision and attention to detail in the assessment.
were rigorously audited
Implies a formal review, typically of financial records or processes, to ensure compliance.
were evaluated in detail
Focuses on the evaluation aspect, indicating a judgment or appraisal based on careful study.
were probed deeply
Indicates a searching and exploratory examination, often to uncover hidden information.
were put under the microscope
This is an idiomatic alternative which means examined in great detail. The idiom may be seen as informal.
FAQs
How can I use "were scrutinized" in a sentence?
The phrase "were scrutinized" indicates a close and critical examination. For example, "The financial records "were scrutinized" by the auditors" shows a detailed inspection.
What are some alternatives to "were scrutinized"?
Alternatives include "were examined closely", "were carefully inspected", or "were thoroughly investigated", each suggesting a different nuance of detailed examination.
Is it better to use "were scrutinized" or "was scrutinized"?
"Were scrutinized" is used for plural subjects, while "was scrutinized" is for singular subjects. For example, "The documents were scrutinized", but "The report was scrutinized".
What does it mean when something "were scrutinized"?
When something "were scrutinized", it means it underwent a thorough and critical examination, often to detect errors, assess validity, or understand its components in detail.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested