Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were recorded by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were recorded by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are talking about something that has been documented, such as a song or a statement. For example, "The artist's song lyrics were recorded by a local recording studio."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
were registered with
were associated with
were affiliated with
were members of
were linked to
were connected to
were related to
were attributed to
were known for
become associated with
were concerned with
recommendations corresponded to
established associated with
was associated with
established cooperation with
were part of
were designated with
became joined by
were joined by
were engaged by
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
All interviews were recorded by digital sound-recorder.
Science
Electric signals were recorded by a conventional recorder (Hartenstein 1996).
Many moonquakes were recorded by those instruments.
Encyclopedias
His comments were recorded by NBC.
News & Media
But the biggest changes were recorded by the patients' spouses.
News & Media
The remarks were recorded by The New York Times.
News & Media
Load measurements were recorded by the actuator.
The psychological reactions were recorded by questionnaires.
Data were recorded by a Shimadzu integrator.
Science
The resulting rat motions were recorded by video camera.
Science
Oral manifestations were recorded by using established presumptive clinical criteria.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "were recorded by", ensure that you clearly identify who or what did the recording. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "were recorded by" without specifying the recorder. For example, instead of saying "The events were recorded by", specify "The events were recorded by the security cameras".
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were recorded by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an action (recording) was performed on a subject by a specific agent or instrument. Ludwig examples show its use in diverse contexts, from scientific data collection to news reporting, as also confirmed by Ludwig AI.
Frequent in
Science
62%
News & Media
33%
Encyclopedias
2%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Reference
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were recorded by" is a grammatically correct and versatile passive construction widely used across various domains. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase effectively communicates how information was captured, whether in formal scientific research, news reporting, or general documentation. With a neutral register and high frequency, "were recorded by" is a reliable way to describe the recording process, ensuring clarity and context. Be sure to specify who or what did the recording to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were documented by
Replaces "recorded" with "documented", emphasizing the formal aspect of making a record.
were captured by
Substitutes "recorded" with "captured", highlighting the act of obtaining something, like an image or sound.
were registered by
Replaces "recorded" with "registered", focusing on the act of formally noting something in a system.
were logged by
Substitutes "recorded" with "logged", indicating a systematic recording of events or data.
were registered with
Replaces "recorded by" with "registered with", changing the focus slightly to indicate the entity with whom the recording was made.
were cataloged by
Substitutes "recorded" with "cataloged", indicating a listing or classification of items.
were chronicled by
Replaces "recorded" with "chronicled", emphasizing a detailed and historical account.
were taped by
Replacing 'recorded' with 'taped' specifies that the recording was audio or video.
were monitored by
Changes the verb to "monitored", implying a continuous observation and recording.
were preserved by
Replaces "recorded" with "preserved", emphasizing the act of keeping something intact for future use.
FAQs
How can I use "were recorded by" in a sentence?
Use "were recorded by" to indicate the means or entity that captured or documented something. For example, "The discussions "were recorded by" the committee secretary".
What are some alternatives to "were recorded by"?
You can use alternatives like "were documented by", "were captured by", or "were registered by" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were recorded by"?
While "were recorded by" is in the passive voice, it's appropriate when the recorder is important to highlight or when the action is more significant than the actor. If the actor is very important, you might consider rewriting in the active voice.
What's the difference between "were recorded by" and "were registered with"?
"Were recorded by" implies the act of capturing data or information, while "were registered with" indicates that information was formally noted or filed with an entity. For example, data "were recorded by" sensors, while complaints "were registered with" the authorities.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested