Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were recorded at
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were recorded at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the location or time where something was documented or captured, often in the context of audio, video, or data collection. Example: "The interviews were recorded at the community center last Saturday."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
ERP were recorded at the same time.
Smaller differences were recorded at low speeds.
RPE scores were recorded at peak exercise.
Science
Dead trees were recorded at each measurement.
Science
The sounds were recorded at Avatar Studios in NY.
News & Media
slaughter performance were recorded at 70 d of age.
Body weight and milk yield were recorded at each milking.
Science
Changes in body weight were recorded at 10 days interval.
Science
The MICs were recorded at 32 128 μg/ml.
Science
NMR were recorded at Bruke 300 MHz facility.
Science
Scans were recorded at 2 h after injection.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were recorded at", ensure that the location or time specified is relevant and provides context to the information being presented. For example, "The seismic readings were recorded at the epicenter" provides clear context.
Common error
Avoid using "were recorded at" without specifying what was recorded or why the location/time is significant. Saying "Measurements were recorded at" is vague without further clarification.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were recorded at" functions as a passive construction indicating that something was documented or captured at a specific location or time. Ludwig AI examples show its use in scientific contexts for measurements and in news for events.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
15%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were recorded at" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to indicate where or when information, data, or events were documented. As Ludwig AI explains, it is commonly found in scientific and news contexts, suggesting its suitability for formal and professional communication. When using this phrase, it's important to provide sufficient context regarding what was recorded and why the location or time is significant. Alternatives like "were documented at" or "were captured at" can be used to add variety to writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were documented at
Replaces "recorded" with "documented", emphasizing the act of formally noting something at a specific location or time.
were registered at
Substitutes "recorded" with "registered", implying an official or formal recording process at a particular point.
were logged at
Uses "logged" instead of "recorded", suggesting a systematic recording, often in a technical or scientific context at a particular moment.
were captured at
Replaces "recorded" with "captured", emphasizing the act of obtaining or seizing data or information at a specified time or place.
were measured at
Substitutes "recorded" with "measured", implying a quantifiable value was obtained and noted at a specific location.
were observed at
Uses "observed" instead of "recorded", emphasizing visual or sensory noticing of something at a specific place or time.
were detected at
Replaces "recorded" with "detected", highlighting the discovery or finding of something at a particular point.
were captured in
Changes the preposition to "in", focusing on capturing something within a specific medium or record.
were chronicled at
Substitutes "recorded" with "chronicled", indicating a detailed and historical record at a specific location.
were archived at
Uses "archived" instead of "recorded", implying the information was stored for future reference at a particular destination.
FAQs
How can I use "were recorded at" in a sentence?
You can use "were recorded at" to specify where or when data, events, or observations were documented. For example, "The interviews "were recorded at" the community center last Saturday" or "Temperatures "were recorded at" hourly intervals".
What are some alternatives to "were recorded at"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "were documented at", "were registered at", or "were captured at" to express a similar meaning.
Is it correct to say "data was recorded at" or "data were recorded at"?
Because "data" is the plural form of "datum", the correct usage is "data were recorded at". However, in informal contexts, "data was recorded at" is sometimes used, though it is grammatically incorrect.
What's the difference between "were recorded at" and "were recorded in"?
"Were recorded at" specifies a specific location or point in time, whereas "were recorded in" refers to a medium or a broader geographical area. For example, "The meeting "were recorded at" the main office" versus "The performances "were recorded in" high definition".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested