Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were real
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were real" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something existed or was true in the past. Example: "The stories he told about his adventures were real, not just figments of his imagination."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
These were real people.
News & Media
Poets were real people.
News & Media
"There were real emergencies".
News & Media
The bullets were real.
News & Media
But they were real.
News & Media
None were real.
News & Media
Those hopes were real.
News & Media
"They were real heroes".
News & Media
Those sufferings were real.
News & Media
There were real assets.
News & Media
Both Kings were real.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were real" to emphasize the authenticity or genuine nature of something, distinguishing it from what is fake, imagined, or artificial. For example, "The emotions displayed in the play were real, not just acting."
Common error
Avoid using "were real" in overly casual or informal settings where simpler alternatives like "happened" or "existed" would suffice. This maintains clarity and avoids sounding overly emphatic or dramatic.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were real" functions as a predicative adjective, modifying the subject of a sentence to assert the genuine or authentic nature of something. Ludwig examples show it describes people, events, feelings, and objects to distinguish them from the fake or imagined.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were real" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that asserts the authenticity or genuine existence of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for a variety of contexts, particularly in news and media, where it serves to distinguish facts from fiction. While versatile, it's best employed when emphasizing genuineness is crucial, and simpler alternatives might suffice in more informal settings. Remember, the choice between "were real" and alternatives like "actually existed" depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
actually existed
Focuses on the fact of existence rather than the quality of being genuine.
truly happened
Emphasizes the occurrence or taking place of something in reality.
genuinely occurred
Combines the ideas of authenticity and factual occurrence.
were authentic
Highlights the absence of falseness or imitation.
were legitimate
Indicates that something was in accordance with the law or rules.
were factual
Stresses that something is based on or contains facts.
were veridical
Highlights truthfulness and accuracy, often in a philosophical context.
held substance
Emphasizes the importance and validity behind something.
carried weight
Highlights significance and influence.
were tangible
Emphasizes that something is perceptible by touch and therefore real.
FAQs
How can I use "were real" in a sentence?
You can use "were real" to emphasize that something was not fake, imagined, or artificial. For example, "The dangers they faced "were real", and they knew it."
What phrases are similar in meaning to "were real"?
Alternatives include "actually existed", "truly happened", or "were authentic" depending on the specific context.
Is it appropriate to use "were real" in formal writing?
Yes, "were real" is appropriate in formal writing, especially when you need to stress the genuineness or actuality of something. For example, "The financial implications of the decision "were real" and significant."
What is the difference between "were real" and "were true"?
"Were real" emphasizes existence and authenticity, while "were true" emphasizes factual accuracy. You'd use "were real" to talk about events or objects, and "were true" to talk about statements or beliefs. For example, "The artifacts discovered "were real"," but "The rumors circulating "were true"."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested