were processed as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were processed as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how something was handled or categorized during a procedure or analysis. Example: "The data were processed as per the established protocols to ensure accuracy and reliability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The data collected from this station were processed as well.

Earth, Planets and Space

Eyes were processed as above.

Plosone

Coral fragments were processed as follows.

Plosone

Only cell lines were processed as dye-swap pairs.

Plosone

The resulting homogenates were processed as above.

BMC Plant Biology

Blood culture bottles were processed as described.

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

The papers were processed as described.

BMC Clinical Pathology

At sampling, roots were processed as above.

Horticulture Research

and data were processed as described.

American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy

All other samples were processed as described.

BMC Infectious Diseases

dHPC O2 signals were processed as follows.

European Journal of Neuroscience

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were processed as", ensure the subsequent description clearly outlines the steps or procedures involved. Be specific about what actions were taken and why.

Common error

Avoid using "were processed as" without providing sufficient detail about the processing method. Vague statements can leave the reader confused about the actual steps taken.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were processed as" functions as part of the passive voice, indicating that a subject underwent a specific treatment or procedure. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a common and grammatically correct way to describe how something was handled.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were processed as" is a grammatically correct and very common passive voice construction used to describe the application of a method or procedure. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and the provided examples demonstrate its frequent use in scientific and technical writing. When using this phrase, it's essential to provide sufficient detail about the processing method to avoid ambiguity. While primarily found in formal and scientific contexts, understanding its function and appropriate usage can enhance clarity and precision in various forms of writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were handled according to

Emphasizes the manner in which something was managed or treated, focusing on adherence to a specific protocol.

were treated following

Highlights the actions taken upon something, suggesting a sequence of steps were performed.

were subjected to

Indicates that something underwent a specific process or treatment, often implying a test or analysis.

were prepared using

Focuses on the preparation stage, emphasizing the tools or techniques used.

were analyzed via

Specifies the method of analysis employed, highlighting the analytical technique.

were evaluated under

Implies a specific set of conditions or standards were applied during the assessment.

were manipulated through

Suggests active intervention or modification was performed using a particular approach.

were refined by means of

Emphasizes the improvement or purification achieved through a particular method.

were refined via

Indicates the use of an instrument to improve something.

were worked on according to

Indicates the use of a specific method or a precise reference during the working process.

FAQs

How can I use "were processed as" in a sentence?

You can use "were processed as" to describe the specific steps taken to handle or treat something. For example, "The samples "were processed as described" in the protocol."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "were processed as"?

Alternatives include phrases like "were treated as", "were handled according to", or "were subjected to", depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing a process?

While active voice is generally preferred for clarity, passive voice with phrases like "were processed as" is appropriate when the process itself is more important than the actor performing it. For example, the sentence "The data were processed as per the protocol" emphasizes data handling. Active voice would shift the focus on who performed the data processing which may not be needed.

What does "were processed as described" mean?

"Were processed as described" indicates that a procedure was followed according to a previously mentioned or established protocol. It's commonly used to avoid repeating detailed steps, assuming the reader has access to the referenced description.