were previously described

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were previously described" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been mentioned or explained earlier in a text or conversation. Example: "The methods used in this study were previously described in our earlier publication."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Similar SD-OCT outer retinal changes were previously described.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

The morphological results were previously described by our team.

Neuroscience Letters

CCSP-rtTA mice were previously described [23].

Plosone

Surgical procedures were previously described [5].

Plosone

PCR conditions were previously described [16].

Plosone

DHS samples were previously described in [26].

Plosone

Akt expression constructs were previously described [32].

Plosone

These data were previously described in [1].

Plosone

siRNAs against SNX4 were previously described [9].

Plosone

Procedures to assess KORp-ir were previously described [1], [29].

Plosone

Plasmids and Luciferase Assays were previously described [29] [32].

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were previously described", include a citation or reference to the original source. This adds credibility and allows readers to easily find more information.

Common error

Avoid stating that something "were previously described" without providing a reference or context where it was described. Always point readers to the source material.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were previously described" functions as a passive voice construction, typically used to refer to information, methods, or procedures that have been detailed in prior publications or sections of a document. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were previously described" is a grammatically sound and common construction, particularly in scientific and academic writing. It serves to efficiently reference information or procedures detailed elsewhere. As Ludwig AI states, this phrase is correct and usable in English. The key is to always provide a clear citation or reference to the source material, ensuring readers can easily access the original description. While alternatives exist, such as "were earlier detailed" or "had been described before", the core function remains the same: linking back to prior information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had been described before

Emphasizes the temporal aspect, indicating the description occurred at an earlier time.

were formerly described

Highlights that the description is from an earlier period or context.

were earlier detailed

Focuses on the timing, specifying that a detailing happened at an earlier stage.

have been detailed previously

Highlights the action of detailing was done at an earlier stage.

were outlined earlier

Emphasizes that only the outline was done at an earlier time.

were discussed earlier

Highlights that the discussion of the topic was done at an earlier time.

were documented before

Focuses on the act of documentation being completed prior to the current context.

were reported previously

Emphasizes the aspect of reporting, stating it happened in the past.

were characterized earlier

Focuses on the characterization aspect and states that the characterization happened earlier.

were already mentioned

Indicates that the topic has been brought up in the past.

FAQs

How can I use "were previously described" in a sentence?

This phrase is used to refer back to information that has already been presented or published. For example: "The experimental procedures "were previously described" in Smith et al. (2010)."

What are some alternatives to "were previously described"?

You could use phrases like "were formerly described", "were earlier detailed", or "had been described before" depending on the context.

Is it necessary to provide a citation after using "were previously described"?

Yes, it is considered good practice to provide a citation or reference when using "were previously described". This allows readers to easily find the original source of the information.

What's the difference between ""were previously described"" and "were described earlier"?

The phrases are very similar, but "were previously described" emphasizes that the description occurred at some point in the past, while "were described earlier" highlights that it happened at an earlier point relative to the current context.