Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were part of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"were part of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that was integrated or included in a larger entity or group. For example: - The students' success on the project were part of their dedication and hard work. - The new regulations were part of the government's effort to improve safety standards. - The sculptures on display at the museum were part of a traveling exhibit from Europe.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
We were part of that.
News & Media
GSEs were part of it.
News & Media
They were part of it.
News & Media
They were part of French culture.
News & Media
We were part of a feminist revolution.
News & Media
They were part of the equation".
News & Media
"Gays were part of a broader mosaic".
News & Media
They were part of the family".
News & Media
Bars were part of the family business.
News & Media
They were part of a deluge.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
Everybody involved [were part of] the achievement".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were part of" to clearly indicate membership, inclusion, or contribution to a larger group, system, or event. Ensure the context provides clarity on what the subject was a part of.
Common error
Avoid using "were part of" without specifying the larger entity or context. For example, instead of saying "They were part of," clarify with "They were part of the team" or "They were part of the experiment."
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were part of" functions as a predicate adjective, indicating the inclusion or membership of a subject within a larger entity or group. As Ludwig AI suggests, it clearly denotes a relationship of belonging or contribution. Examples show its usage in various contexts, confirming its role in specifying the connection between a subject and a broader context.
Frequent in
News & Media
80%
Formal & Business
10%
Science
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were part of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, indicating inclusion, membership, or contribution. According to Ludwig AI, it serves to describe the relationship between a subject and a larger entity across various contexts, primarily in news and media, but also in more formal settings. While highly versatile, it's important to provide sufficient context to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases like "were included in" or "played a role in" can offer nuanced variations in meaning. Proper usage involves ensuring subject-verb agreement and avoiding incomplete contexts. With its prevalence in authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian, "were part of" remains a reliable and effective way to convey a sense of belonging or integration.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were members of
Highlights the status of belonging to a specific group or organization.
were included in
Focuses on the act of being added or contained within something.
were involved in
Suggests participation or engagement in an activity or situation.
constituted a portion of
Emphasizes the quantitative aspect, suggesting a specific fraction or share.
were associated with
Indicates a connection or link, often suggesting a correlation rather than direct inclusion.
formed a component of
Stresses the structural or essential element within a system or whole.
belonged to
Indicates a sense of ownership or affiliation with a group or entity.
were affiliated with
Implies a formal connection or association with an institution or cause.
played a role in
Highlights the active contribution or function within a process or event.
contributed to
Focuses on the act of giving or adding something to achieve a collective result.
FAQs
How can I use "were part of" in a sentence?
Use "were part of" to indicate that something or someone belonged to, was included in, or contributed to a larger group or whole. For example, "The students were part of the research project".
What are some alternatives to "were part of"?
You can use alternatives like "were included in", "constituted a portion of", or "played a role in" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "was part of" instead of "were part of"?
The correct form depends on the subject. Use "was part of" for singular subjects (e.g., "The exhibit was part of the museum's collection") and "were part of" for plural subjects (e.g., "The artifacts were part of the exhibit").
What's the difference between "were part of" and "were a part of"?
"Were part of" is more common and generally preferred. "Were a part of" isn't incorrect, but it's less frequently used. The meaning is essentially the same, but "were part of" is more concise and natural-sounding.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested