were included in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were included in" is correct and usable in written English.
For example, "All the materials needed for the experiment were included in the kit."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

My grades were included in those.

Independent

Few details were included in the announcement.

The New York Times

Four company units were included in the filing.

The New York Times

Coffee and petits fours were included in the menu.

The New York Times - Travel

Two Westchester organizations were included in this round.

The New York Times

Collaborations were included in both the arts and the sciences.

The New York Times - Books

Both attacks were included in the charges announced Monday.

The New York Times

No living figures were included in the list.

The Guardian

None of these were included in the NAO investigation.

The Guardian

."—became well known after they were included in the film.

The New Yorker

Many new species were included in the collection.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were included in", ensure the subject clearly identifies what is being added or contained within the larger entity. For example, "Relevant data points were included in the final report."

Common error

Avoid using "were included in" when referring to a single item. Instead, use "was included in". For example, it's incorrect to say "The document were included in the file"; the correct usage is "The document was included in the file".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were included in" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that certain items or elements formed a part of a larger whole. Ludwig AI affirms its correct usage. It is frequently employed to specify the contents or components of something, such as a report, study, or analysis.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were included in" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that certain items or elements are part of a larger entity. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, showcasing its frequent use across various contexts, particularly in scientific and news-related domains. When using this phrase, remember to ensure grammatical agreement with plural subjects and consider the level of formality appropriate for your writing context. By avoiding common mistakes like using "were" with singular nouns and exploring related phrases, you can enhance the clarity and precision of your writing. Keep in mind that it is suitable for neutral writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were considered part of

Directly states that the items were regarded as belonging to something else.

were incorporated into

Replaces "included" with "incorporated", suggesting a more integrated inclusion.

were made a component of

Emphasizes that the items became essential elements of the whole.

were integrated within

Similar to 'incorporated', but emphasizes the positioning of the items within a larger structure.

were listed as part of

A more specific version of 'considered part of', explicitly mentioning a listing.

were comprised within

Uses "comprised" to indicate that the items form part of the whole.

were counted among

Indicates that the items were among a group of things that were tallied or listed.

were encompassed by

Highlights that the items fall within a certain scope or range.

were subsumed under

Suggests a hierarchical structure where items are classified under a broader category.

were factored into

Implies that the items were considered as elements in a calculation or assessment.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "were included in" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "were incorporated into", "were integrated within", or "were encompassed by".

What's a simple way to explain what "were included in" means?

It means that certain items or elements formed a part of something else, such as a list, a group, or a document. For example, "images were included in" the presentation.

Which is correct, "was included in" or "were included in"?

"Was included in" is used with singular subjects, while "were included in" is used with plural subjects. For instance, "The chapter was included in the book", but "The chapters were included in the book".

Can I use "were featured in" instead of "were included in"?

Yes, in some contexts "were featured in" can be a suitable alternative, especially when you want to highlight the prominence or special attention given to those items. However, "included" is more general.