Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were on hand

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were on hand" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that someone or something was present or available at a particular time or event. Example: "Several experts were on hand to answer questions during the conference."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Guevara's widow Aleida March and one of his daughters were on hand to sign copies.

News & Media

Huffington Post

No policemen were on hand.

News & Media

Independent

The two departing tenants were on hand.

News & Media

The New York Times

Conservators were on hand inspecting its condition.

Luckily for McFadden, bouncers were on hand.

News & Media

The Guardian

More than a dozen federal marshals were on hand.

They were on hand to listen to poetry.

News & Media

The New York Times

Trained workers were on hand to answer any questions.

In all, 50 or more players were on hand.

Medical personnel were on hand with wheelchairs and stretchers.

News & Media

The New York Times

Citibank and Scotiabank were on hand to discuss loans.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were on hand" to indicate that people or resources were available and present at a specific event or location. This phrase is appropriate for both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was on hand" when referring to multiple people or things; the correct plural form is "were on hand". For example, "The experts were on hand" is correct, while "The experts was on hand" is not.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were on hand" functions as a verbal phrase indicating the presence and availability of individuals or resources at a specific location or event. Ludwig examples show its application in describing the presence of personnel, experts, or equipment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Academia

23%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Science

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were on hand" is a versatile and commonly used expression that indicates the presence and availability of individuals or resources at a particular event or location. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely accepted. The phrase is most frequently found in "News & Media" and academic contexts but is appropriate for both formal and informal writing. When using "were on hand", remember to ensure the correct plural form is used and consider alternatives like "were present" or "were available" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. The expert rating reflects its correct usage and consistent application across diverse sources.

FAQs

How can I use "were on hand" in a sentence?

Use "were on hand" to indicate that someone or something was available or present at a particular event or location. For example, "Medical personnel "were on hand" with wheelchairs and stretchers".

What does "were on hand" mean?

The phrase "were on hand" means that people or resources were present and available to assist or participate in something. It emphasizes their readiness and accessibility.

What are some alternatives to "were on hand"?

Alternatives include "were present", "were available", or "were in attendance", depending on the specific context and level of formality you want to convey.

Is it better to use "were on hand" or "was on hand"?

"Were on hand" is used when referring to multiple people or things, while "was on hand" is used for a single person or thing. The plural form, ""were on hand"", is appropriate when discussing a group.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: